Примеры использования Use nuclear weapons на Английском языке и их переводы на Русский язык
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
Test or use nuclear weapons;
As we are all aware, the United States was the world's first country to develop and use nuclear weapons.
And you cannot use nuclear weapons against individuals- that would be simply stupid.
His delegation remained highly concerned that terrorists might one day acquire or even use nuclear weapons.
And they have a strange protection: you cannot use nuclear weapons against them, you cannot throw atom bombs at them.
Люди также переводят
Russian"may use nuclear weapons when the existence of the state, its sovereignty, or territorial integrity is jeopardized.".
They furthermore committed themselves not to test, manufacture, possess, store,deploy or use nuclear weapons and to provide for verification.
The P5 indicated that they will not use nuclear weapons against any country that is not in possession of nuclear weapons, unless their vital interests are at stake; they(or their allies) are invaded or they are attacked in alliance with a nuclear country.
The United States, the Russian Federation andChina would agree not to threaten or use nuclear weapons against Japan or either of the two Koreas.
The U.S. Nuclear Posture Review, leaked in 2002, revealed that the U.S. intended to create and test new nuclear weapons, andoutlined a broad array of contingencies under which the U.S. might use nuclear weapons.
Nuclear-weapon States should provide assurances that they would not use nuclear weapons against countries within the nuclear-weapon-free zones.
The Government of Jamaica has not provided and does not intend to provide any support to non-State actors that attempt to develop, acquire, manufacture, possess, transport,transfer or use nuclear weapons and their means of delivery.
The discussion must instead focus on the signs that some nuclear Powers might use nuclear weapons with a limited and controllable scope on people made defenceless by poverty, hunger and disease.
The other NATO countries are under an extended nuclear deterrence relationship whereby the United States could use nuclear weapons on their behalf.
Unilateral statements by nuclear States that they will not use nuclear weapons against non-nuclear States and will apply the principle of non-first use are insufficient because they can be reversed and are no more than declaratory undertakings.
Under the terms of this Declaration, signed at Seoul on 17 February 1992, 4/ the Democratic People's Republic of Korea and the Republic of Korea undertook not to test, produce, receive, possess, store,deploy or use nuclear weapons.
In the Declaration, the two States agreed not to test, manufacture, produce, receive, possess, store,deploy or use nuclear weapons; to use nuclear energy solely for peaceful purposes; and not to possess nuclear reprocessing and uranium enrichment facilities.
The Russian Federation will not use nuclear weapons against any non-nuclear-weapon State party to the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons, except in the event of an attack on the Russian Federation, its territory, armed forces or allies conducted by a State of this kind that is linked by an agreement of association with a nuclear-weapon State or that acts together with, or with the support of a nuclear-weapon State in carrying out such an attack." e/.
Human beings, regardless of race, creed, religion, culture or political ideology, should have the right to condemn any attempt to produce, acquire,possess or use nuclear weapons and also to receive information with respect to their effects.
The United States will not use nuclear weapons against any non-nuclear-weapon State party to the non-proliferation Treaty or any comparable internationally binding commitment not to acquire nuclear explosive devices, except in the case of an attack on the United States, its territories or armed forces, or its allies, by such a State allied to a nuclear-weapon State or associated with a nuclear-weapon State in carrying out or sustaining the attack." g/.
New and unequivocal negative security assurances(NSAs) should be given by all nuclear-armed states, supported by binding Security Council resolution,that they will not use nuclear weapons against NPT-compliant non-nuclear weapon states. 17.33-39.
If nuclear disarmament is perceived as an act of political will which must commit the nuclear-weapon States to dismantle their capability to produce and use nuclear weapons and conclude safeguards agreements with the International Atomic Energy Agency on nuclear material under their jurisdiction, it is evident that this will require a resolute decision on the part of the highest authorities of those States, as well as the States that maintain nuclear facilities without the benefits of safeguards.
Prior to the complete prohibition and destruction of all nuclear weapons, all the nuclear-weapon States should undertake that under no circumstances orconditions would they use nuclear weapons against non-nuclear-weapon States or nuclear-weapon-free zones.
The Russian Federation explained its current position on security assurances,stating that it would not use nuclear weapons against any non-nuclear-weapon State party to the non-proliferation Treaty except in the event of an attack on the Russian Federation, its territory, armed forces or allies conducted by such a State of the kind that was linked by an agreement of association with a nuclear-weapon State, or acting together with, or with the support of, a nuclear-weapon State in carrying out such an attack. 13/.
New and unequivocal negative security assurances(NSAs) should be given by all nuclear-armed states, supported by binding Security Council resolution,that they will not use nuclear weapons against NPT-compliant non-nuclear weapon states. 17.33-39.
The same State maintained that negative securityassurances included two aspects, the first, that the nuclear-weapon States not use nuclear weapons against non-nuclear-weapon States and the second, that the nuclear-weapon States should not first use nuclear weapons against each other.
Call on the nuclear-weapon States and on all other States possessing nuclear weapons to commit themselves to reducing the role of nuclear weapons in their national security strategies, and call on the nuclear-weapon States to take, as soon as possible,such measures as providing stronger negative security assurances that they will not use nuclear weapons against non-nuclear-weapon States that comply with the Non-Proliferation Treaty.
It is to be noted that it is also proposed to make certain amendments to the Radiation Protection Act 2003 to cater for the provisions made under resolution 1540(2004) so that attempts to develop, manufacture, acquire, possess, transport,transfer or use nuclear weapons and their means of delivery, as well as participation or any form of assistance in the financing of such activities, would constitute an offence under Mauritian law.
In 1978, the United States, the then-Soviet Union and the United Kingdom,depositories of the Non-Proliferation Treaty, announced a statement on"negative security assurance"-- albeit de bene esse-- stating that they would not use nuclear weapons against the non-nuclear States that are parties to the Non-Proliferation Treaty.
Testing or using nuclear weapons;