Приклади вживання It argued Англійська мовою та їх переклад на Українською
{-}
- 
                        Colloquial
                    
- 
                        Ecclesiastic
                    
- 
                        Computer
                    
It argued that"the central question that emerges….
America would never kill its way to the end of its wars," it argued.
It argued that this information was confidential for 12 years.
PC Zone agreed, but in a negative sense- it argued that The Age of Kings"is essentially an update of a two-year-old game".
It argued that as a result of the Chamber judgment it  had two choices.
                Люди також перекладають
            
Doha also ingratiated itself with the international aviation community at the U.N. International Civil Aviation Organizationin Montreal, where it argued that the Saudi-led aerial blockade is illegal, an argument that Brussels backed.
It argued that genuinely free elections were impossible in the totalitarian North.
Kenneth Waltz's Theory of InternationalPolitics was a critical text in this debate as it argued that international anarchy was a core element of international politics.[3] After this era Classical Realist doctrines became less prominent in favor of Neo-realism.[4].
It argued that intermediaries were not best suited to decide upon the legality of user-generated content.
When Lithuania declared its independence in 1990, it argued that it  did not need to follow the process of secession from the Soviet Union outlined in the Soviet constitution.
It argued that it  will have a very positive impact for both patients and professionals in the field of health.
Supreme Court ruled that this was not so, in part because it argued that the exclusion of pregnancy was not in itself a gender-based discrimination but instead merely removed one physical condition from coverage.
It argued that there was no legal basis for them to remain in the property, which had been reallocated to a new tenant R.
On 23 April 2004 the applicant company filed a motion in which it argued that the City Court had no territorial jurisdiction over the company's legal headquarters and requested that the case be referred to a court in Nefteyugansk, where it  was registered.
It argued that there was a European consensus that no service provider should be liable for content it  had not authored.
Firstly, it argued that the comments were reactions from members of the public to an event caused by the Saaremaa Shipping Company and not to the article as such.
It argued that the triggering of Article 50, which starts the two-year process for Britain to leave the EU, should be rejected because the government has left too many questions unanswered.
Public interest, it argued, is wide and leads to uncertainty, making it"not only open to abuse, but deprives the courts of clear principles on which to adjudicate property rights disputes".
Evidence showed, it argued, that alternative tests were available that would likely have passed more minority candidates and that were at least equally well suited to identify qualified officers.
It argued that"the central question that emerges… is whether the White community in the South is entitled to take such measures as are necessary to prevail, politically and culturally, in areas where it  does not predominate numerically?
It argued: n overwhelming preponderance of power will remain wholly unattainable unless the Allies win the present war and the United States assumes responsibilities commensurate with its power- in the war, in the peace after the war and in the maintenance and improvement of the new order after the peace.
In addition, it argued that the applicant had not carried out subordinate duties, that she received a higher salary than that paid to the diplomats in post, and that, given that she had Burundian nationality and was resident in France, she had few ties with Switzerland.
It argued that the State had been in breach of its obligations during the period of validity of the contract, in particular in so far as it  had, since 27 November 1973, prohibited the continuation of work on the construction of the refinery at Megara and had not, since 9 February 1974, taken any steps to expropriate the land required for that construction.
It argues that the intellectual….
It argues that unfettered capitalism will create a productive market on its own.
It argues that the United States should promote democracy and refutes some of the most important arguments against U.S. efforts to spread democracy.
It argues that international institutions can allow nations to successfully cooperate in the international system.
It argues that it  is not just politicians and the media who fail to focus on this grossly slewed access to education.
In particular, it argues for a distinction between research, which seeks generalizable knowledge, and practice, which includes everyday treatment and activities.
Further, it argues that the ethical principles of the Belmont Report apply only to research.