Приклади вживання Religious fundamentalism Англійська мовою та їх переклад на Українською
{-}
-
Colloquial
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Computer
Religious fundamentalism was centered.
We must fight religious fundamentalism.
Scientists have established a link between brain damage and religious fundamentalism.
The fact is that religious fundamentalism is a totally modern phenomenon.
Only civil society is able to oppose religious fundamentalism.
We cannot mix up religious fundamentalism with terrorism, even if we know there are elements that unite them.”.
The need to oppose(neo-)Stalinism, chauvinism, and religious fundamentalism.
Some believe such policies endorse religious fundamentalism and silence women or restrict their freedom in the public arena.
The actions of both the evangelistic pastor and the Taliban are the religious fundamentalism.”.
Study finds link between religious fundamentalism and brain damage.
Religious fundamentalism, hate speech, political extremism, and calls for violence will not be permitted to take part in the contest.
Only civil society is able to oppose religious fundamentalism| April 8, 2011.
The fundamental sign of religious fundamentalism is the hostility and inability to see God's creation in the representative of other confession.
When the latter ceased to be an important political contender,Noyevyi's interests shifted from university syndicalism to religious fundamentalism.
Religious fundamentalism, even before it eliminates human beings by perpetrating horrendous killings, eliminates God himself, turning him into a mere ideological.
A shy person by nature,he became an outspoken liberal intellectual in the 1990s against religious fundamentalism and reactionary nationalism in Bangladesh.
Major themes in his poetry and writings include liberal humanism, human relations, romanticised rebellion of youth, theemergence of and consequent events in Bangladesh, and opposition to religious fundamentalism.[1].
Although it is easy enough for smart people to criticize religious fundamentalism, something called“religious moderation” still enjoys immense prestige in our society.
With this project, we aim to emphasise the importance of civic engagement against the ongoing antidemocratic movement that nowadays becomes visible amongst others in rightwing populism,nationalism, religious fundamentalism and antifeminist actions.
The exclusion of religions from the public sphere, just as, in another way, religious fundamentalism, impedes the encounter of peoples and their collaboration for the progress of humanity.
Therefore, it is unacceptable that in our society, possessing such priceless wealth, having advanced intellectuals, thousands of enlightened ulema, in our country, acting with important initiatives in this sphere,adherents of religious fundamentalism appeared.
The Assembly alsowishes to insist on the need to combat all forms of religious fundamentalism and of manipulation of religious beliefs, which are so often the cause of present-day terrorism.
In the panel discussion that followed, Mr. Shravan Garg, a senior journalist, noted that India needed to bring the knowledge systems of science and religion together to forge a pathof development that avoided the dangers of materialism and consumerism on the one hand and religious fundamentalism on the other.
It wishes to raise awareness about the need to combat all forms of religious fundamentalism and the manipulation of religious beliefs for political reasons, which are so often the cause of present day terrorism.
This is done in order to publicly testify about the real situation in the Crimea and Donbason religious persecution and danger of religious fundamentalism, including the Orthodox concept of“Russian World.”.
The Assembly shouldraise awareness about the need to combat all forms of religious fundamentalism and the manipulation of religious beliefs for political reasons, which are so often at the basis of present-day terrorism.
The same determination that condemns every form of fanaticism and religious fundamentalism must also oppose every form of hostility to religion that would restrict the public role of believers in civil and political life.
The second reason Iundertook this is because I'm concerned about the rise of fundamentalism, religious fundamentalism, and people who say they take the Bible literally, which is, according to some polls, as high as 45 or 50 percent of America.