Примери за използване на Court dismissed на Английски и техните преводи на Български
{-}
-
Colloquial
-
Official
-
Medicine
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Computer
The court dismissed the case.
In September 2012, the court dismissed his claims.
The court dismissed the case against Johnson.
On 13 June 1996 the Sofia City Court dismissed the appeal.
The Court dismissed the action in its entirety.
By judgment of 16 December 2015, that court dismissed the action.
That court dismissed the petition in a final judgment of 18 November 1997.
By judgment of 10 November 2015, that court dismissed his application.
In such circumstances, the Court dismissed the applications as incompatible ratione personae with the Convention.
Philip Morris had tried to force the laws to be overturned, but a court dismissed its claim in 2015.
By judgment of 8 July 2016, that court dismissed the appeal and upheld the judgment at first instance.
She received about five and a half million andwanted to increase the compensation but the court dismissed the claim.
With today's judgment the European General Court dismissed the action of Simba Toys in its entirety.
The court dismissed charges against nine Libyans who worked at the same hospital and set them free.
By judgment of 21 September 2011, that court dismissed the action as unfounded.
That court dismissed the claim as impermissible because of the German courts' lack of international jurisdiction.
The five-member Chamber of the Supreme Administrative Court dismissed the appeals against decision No 1-1/2015.
This court dismissed the action and the Slovak Republic appealed its judgment before the German Bundesgerichtshof.
Furthermore, just as it did in the other cases cited above, the Supreme Administrative Court dismissed the appeal against the deportation order, considering itself bound by the above-mentioned declaratory statement.
The court dismissed the actions brought by Slovakia and Hungary against the provisional mechanism for the mandatory relocation of asylum seekers.
By decision of 30 April 2019, the Court dismissed the application for the case to be heard in camera.
The court dismissed the plaintiffs' claim the government should also be held responsible for its failure to enforce tsunami safety measures.
Appeal against the judgment of the Court of First Instance(Fifth Chamber) of 10 October 2006 in CaseT-172/05 Armacell v OHIM whereby the Court dismissed an action by the applicant for the word mark‘ARMAFOAM' for goods in Class 20 for.
Last Friday the court dismissed the case against a third man, Adrian Clark, ruling that there was no case to answer.
The court dismissed it holding that the health risk for the applicant was the same whether he was in prison or at home.
By judgment of 27 April 2005 that court dismissed the action as inadmissible on account of the lack of jurisdiction of the German courts. .
The court dismissed all of Danov's claims and confirmed that there is evidence of Danov having unduly received EUR 15,000 in unemployment benefits.
On Friday(25th February) the court dismissed the case against a third man, Adrian Clark, ruling that there was no case to answer.
That court dismissed the action, noting that Article 6.7.3 of the ARB 1995 did not infringe paragraph 158k of the VersVG interpreted in the light of Article 4(1) of Directive 87/344 but, rather, supplemented it and provided a solution to cases of collective loss.
On 9 July 2002 the court dismissed the appeal, finding that the issue had already been decided by the judgment of 13 December 1996(see paragraph 25 above).