Примери за използване на Court pointed out на Английски и техните преводи на Български
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
-
Medicine
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Computer
Concerning the case at hand, the Court pointed out above that the quashing of the judgment of 15 April 2011 was aimed at correcting a mistake.
The Court pointed out that there are very limited circumstances in which a characteristic related to religion can constitute a genuine and determining occupational requirement.
As for the refusal by the Council to grant access to the records of the Commission andthe Member States' delegations who attended the Committee meeting of 19 December 2003, the Court pointed out that the applicant had not asked the Council to grant it access to such internal records when submitting its confirmatory application, and the applicant's arguments concerning access to those records could therefore not be accepted.
Lastly, the Court pointed out weaknesses in the administrative and control systems set up to ensure that existing measures were correctly implemented.
In its Special Report No 4/2007(24), the Court pointed out shortcomings in respect of the system of physical and substitution checks on export refund consignments.
As the Court pointed out in its opinion, however, there are many other potential sources of information available to the Commission in forming a rounded view of performance.
In the second place, the Court pointed out that Directive 2000/78 does not itself lay down the principle of equal treatment in the field of employment and occupation.
As the Court pointed out in 2008,‘Having comparable data on intra-Community VAT fraud would contribute to a better targeted cooperation between Member States.
In special report No 2/2013(3)on FP7, the Court pointed out that the Commission does not always apply uniform procedures, which can reduce efficient implementation of the programme and increase the administrative burden for beneficiaries.
The Court pointed out that the subsidiary protection regime must be interpreted and applied in observance of the rights guaranteed by the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union.
Next, the Court pointed out that Directive 2001/29 harmonised copyright, which means that copyright‘may be infringed in each[Member State] in accordance with the applicable substantive law'.
Second, the Court pointed out that an intermediation service, such as the one Airbnb provides, is in no way indispensable to the provision of accommodation services, since the guests and hosts have a number of other channels in that respect.
The Court pointed out that, although there was a directive requiring food products to indicate a‘sell by' date, the directive did not regulate the sale of properly-labelled food products whose‘use by' date had expired.
The Court pointed out that this right is"one of the essential foundations of democratic society"5 and that journalistic freedom allows the possible use of a"degree of exaggeration or even provocation"6, even when it may"offend, shock or disturb".
The Court pointed out that- in order to fulfil the requirement of transparency which underlies Regulation No 1049/2001- the institutions concerned must, in so far as possible and in a non-arbitrary and predictable manner, draw up and retain documentation relating to their activities.
As the Court pointed out with regard to the corresponding provision of the Brussels Convention,(29) the series of formal conditions laid down in Article 23 of Regulation No 44/2001 makes central to the validity of the clause conferring jurisdiction evidence of the existence of an agreement by the parties against whom that clause is enforced.
As the Court pointed out in its report on the structural funds“medium-term processes”(Special Report No 1/2007), evaluation which takes place early enough in a programming period for its results to influence the design of a successor programme will be based on evidence drawn from only a small part of planned spending.
In its judgment in CaixaBank France, the Court pointed out, where credit institutions which are subsidiaries of foreign companies seek to enter the market of a Member State, competing by means of the rate of remuneration paid on sight accounts constitutes one of the most effective methods to that end, so that access to the market by those establishments is made more difficult by the prohibition in question(paragraph 14).
As the Court pointed out,‘a contract of assignment by itself, that is, in the absence of any economic link, does not give the assignor any means of controlling the quality of products which are marketed by the assignee and to which the latter has affixed the trade mark',(48) nor does it indicate implied consent on the part of the assignor to the circulation of such products in the territories in which it still holds its trade mark.
On the second question, the Court points out that in principle it is not its function to compare different decisions of national courts, even if given in apparently similar proceedings;
In this connection, the Court points out that, faced with such a situation, a Member State may decide, in accordance with the Regulation, itself to examine the application.
Furthermore, the Court points out that that period of residence must, in principle, be continuous.
As the Court points out, the Commission has set up financial circuits and introduced the use of standard check-lists for each transaction.
As the Court points out, agri-environmental commitments are generally made for five years whereas the last programming period was seven years.
The Court points out that there are no aggregate figures for EU investment in e-Government in the period 2000- 06 across the different EU funded programmes.
The Court points out at the outset that it has declared the above complaints admissible only in so far as they concerned Mr Kolev's deprivation of liberty between 13 September and 29 November 2001, when he was under house arrest.
The Court points out that where a request based on the Access to Documents Regulation seeks to obtain access to documents including personal data, the provisions of the Data Protection Regulation become applicable in their entirety.
The Court points out that the identified and potential risks linked to the use of electronic cigarettes have led the EU legislature to act in a manner consistent with the requirements stemming from the precautionary principle.
The Court points out that the machinery of protection established by the Convention is subsidiary to the national systems safeguarding human rights judgment of 23 July 1968 on the merits of the"Belgian Linguistic" case, Series A no. 6, p.
In that context, the Court points out that the directive provides, inter alia, that tour organizers must provide sufficient evidence of security for the refund of money paid over in the event of insolvency.