Examples of using Contested judgment in English and their translations into Portuguese
{-}
-
Colloquial
-
Official
-
Medicine
-
Financial
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Computer
-
Official/political
By the contested judgment, the Court of First Instance.
B- The proceedings before the Court of First Instance and the contested judgment.
The contested judgment of 3 June 1997 in Case T-196/95 is set aside.
Accordingly, in paragraph 239 of the contested judgment, the Court found.
The contested judgment shall be varied on the points on which the submissions of the third party are upheld.
Consequently, the Court concluded,in paragraph 34 of the contested judgment.
The appellants claim that the Court should annul the contested judgment and dismiss the action brought by Kronofrance.
A note of the judgment in the third-party proceedings shall be made in the margin of the original of the contested judgment.
However, in the contested judgment, the Court of First Instance concluded that the Commission did not fail to discharge any duties.
The appellants also complain of the Court of First Instance's finding,in paragraphs 251 and 252 of the contested judgment, that a new hearing was not required in the absence of new objections.
In paragraph 25 of the contested judgment, the Court of First Instance gave its reasons for its decision not to grant the requests in question.
Wacker-Chemie and Hoechst dispute the grounds contained in paragraphs 609 to 612 of the contested judgment which relate to participation by the German PVC producers in a quota agreement.
In the contested judgment, the Court of First Instance annulled the contested decision after declaring that the action brought by Kronofrance was admissible and well founded.
However, as the Court correctly explained in paragraph 133 of the contested judgment, even partial annulment could only have led to the adoption of another decision identical in substance.
The contested judgment was delivered on 20 April 1999, ruling on all of the numerous procedural and substantive pleas after a statement of grounds comprising 1269 paragraphs.
Any reference to the economic decline criterion was, in fact,eliminated from the 2002 multisectoral framework, even before the contested judgment was delivered.
However, it noted, in paragraph 37 of the contested judgment, that the French Government had not submitted any observations within the time allowed.
Between Member Sates was affected- constitute an infringement of those rules and, on the other hand, the statements which the Court of First Instance makes in paragraphs 99 to 101,clearly establishes a contradiction in the grounds of the contested judgment.
The Court of First Instance rightly concluded in the contested judgment that neither Turkey nor the Commission was required under the provisions applicable here to send specimens of stamps or.
In their third plea in law, the appellants submit that,should it appear that the Court of First Instance did not err in law in accepting that the Commission gave reasons for the contested decision by referring to the GD Net decision, the contested judgment should be annulled on the ground of contradictory reasoning.
On the contrary, it is apparent from paragraph 194 of the contested judgment that the UCLAF missions in Turkey were undertaken within a reasonable period following the discovery of the initial forgery.
Since the Commission and the Court of First Instance considered that, regardless of the undertakings it provided for, the GD Net decision was likely to put an end to the practices complained of, it appears that the first part of the fifth plea addresses, in any event,a point which was not necessary for the reasoning of the contested judgment, and is consequently immaterial.
By the contested judgment, the Court annulled the Commission's decision of 25 July 2001 relating to aid which the Federal Republic of Germany proposed to grant to the undertaking Glunz.
In this case, the Court of First Instance observed,in paragraph 1223 of the contested judgment, that the fine imposed by the PVC II decision, even expressed in national currency, remains substantially below that maximum.
Contrary to what follows from the contested judgment, the ending of anti-competitive practices is not enough to re-establish an acceptable competitive situation where the structural imbalances caused by those practices have continued.
It must therefore be determined whether the conclusion of the Court of First Instance, at paragraph 92 of the contested judgment, that Article 24(2) of Regulation No 4253/88 as amended authorises the Commission to cancel assistance, is vitiated by an error of law.
In paragraph 121 of the contested judgment, it then stated that it was necessary to examine whether the Commission had infringed the general principle of Community law that decisions adopted following administrative proceedings in competition matters must be adopted within a reasonable time.
By its fourth plea in law, the IECC criticises the Court of First Instance for having infringed,in paragraph 64 of the contested judgment, the principle that the lawfulness of a contested decision is to be assessed solely in the light of the elements of law and of fact in existence on the date of its adoption.
In those circumstances, the contested judgment had to be annulled to the extent to which it held that, in view of the abnormalities found in the anamnesis and clinical examination, the medical officer was entitled to request that a T4/T8 lymphocyte count be carried out and therefore dismissed the applicant's claim that the Commission decision of 6 June 1989 be annulled, without its being necessary to consider the other pleas in law advanced by the applicant.
The Court then examined, in paragraphs 36 to 44 of the contested judgment, whether the applicant could be regarded as an‘interested party' within the meaning of Article 1(h) of Regulation No 659/1999.