What is the translation of " CONTESTED JUDGMENT " in Danish?

• den appellerede dom
• den anfægtede dom

Examples of using Contested judgment in English and their translations into Danish

As stated by the Court in the contested judgment.
Som fremlagt af Retten i den appellerede dom.

Reverse the contested judgment and, in consequence, annul the contested decision; and, in the alternative.
Den appellerede dom ophæves, og følgelig annulleres den anfægtede beslutning.

Any reference to the economic decline criterion was, in fact, eliminated from the 2002 multisectoral framework, even before the contested judgment was delivered.
Enhver henvisning til kriteriet om, at det relevante marked er i økonomisk tilbagegang, blev reelt fjernet fra de multisektorale rammebestemmelser fra 2002, og det gælder også fra før den appellerede doms afsigelse.

The contested judgment was therefore not compatible with paragraph 2 of the operative part of the judgment in the preliminary ruling.
Den anfægtede dom var derfor ikke forenelig med punkt 2 i den præjudicielle afgørelses konklusion.

By application lodged at the Registry of the Court of Justice on 20 May 1992, Shell International Chemical Company Ltd('Shell') brought an appeal against the judgment of the Court of First Instance of 10 March 1992 in Case T-11/89 Shell ν Commission'the contested judgment.
Ved appelskrift indleveret til Domstolens Justitskontor den 20. maj 1992 har Shell International Chemical Company Ltd(herefter»Shell«) appelleret den kendelse, som den 10. marts 1992 blev afsagt af Retten i Første Instans i sagen Shell mod Kommissionen herefter»den appellerede kendelse«.

In paragraphs 3 to 9 of the contested judgment the Court of First Instance set out the relevant provisions of Regulation No 2377/90 as follows.
I præmis 39 i den appellerede dom har Retten beskrevet de relevante bestemmelser i forordning nr. 2377/90 således.

By application lodged at the Court Registry on 17 August 2000, the Commission of the European Communities brought an appeal under Article 49 of the EC Statute of the Court of Justice against the judgment of the Court of First Instance of 8 June 2000 in Joined Cases T-79/96, T-260/97 and T-l 17/98 Camar and Tico ν Commission and Council[2000](hereinafter'the contested judgment'), seeking to have that judgment set aside.
Ved appelskrift indleveret til Domstolens Justitskontor den 17. august 2000 har Kommissionen for De Europæiske Fællesskaber i medfør af artikel 49 i EF-statutten for Domstolen iværksat appel af dom afsagt den 8. juni 2000 af Retten i Første Instans i sagen Camar og Tico mod Kommissionen og Rådet(forenede sager T-79/96, T-260/97 og T-117/98, herefter»den appellerede dom«), med påstand om ophævelse af denne dom..

By the contested judgment, after examining the pleas in law relied on by Mr Tzoanos, the Court of First Instance dismissed the application in its entirety.
Ved den anfægtede dom frifandt Retten som helhed Kommissionen efter at have behandlet de af Tzoanos fremførte anbringender.

The appeal of which this Court has been seised by Pharos SA(hereinafter'Pharos') seeks the annulment of the judgment of the Court of First Instance of 17 February 1998 1(hereinafter'the contested judgment') in so far as it dismissed the claim for damages brought by Pharos against the Commission under Article 235 EC(for merly Article 178) and the second para graph of Article 288 EC formerly the second paragraph of Article 215.
Den appel, Domstolen har fået forelagt af selskabet Pharos SA(herefter»Pharos«) angår en påstand om ophævelse af den dom, Retten i Første Instans afsagde den 17. februar 1998 1(herefter»den appellerede dom«), for så vidt som sagsøgte blev frifundet i den af Pharos anlagte sag med påstand om, at Kommissionen blev kendt erstatningsansvarlig på grundlag af EF-traktatens artikel 178(nu artikel 235 EF) og artikel 215(nu artikel 288 EF), stk. 2.

In paragraph 208 of the contested judgment the Court of First Instance concluded that Mr Tzoanos had also failed to demonstrate the existence of such matters in the context of the proceedings before it.
I den anfægtede doms præmis 208 konkluderede Retten, at Tzoanos heller ikke under sagen ved Retten havde godtgjort, at der var tale om de samme forhold.

In support of the fourth plea, Glunz and OSB maintain that the contested judgment infringes the second paragraph of Article 230 EC, since it goes beyond the pleas raised in support of the action for annulment brought by Kronofrance.
Glunz og OSB har til støtte for det fjerde anbringende gjort gældende, at den appellerede dom er i strid med artikel 230, stk. 2, EF, fordi den går ud over de anbringender, der blev påberåbt i det af Kronofrance rejste annullationssøgsmål.

The contested judgment', by which the Court of First Instance dismissed their application for, in particular, annulment of Commission Decision C(96) 2780 def of 8 October 1996'the contested decision.
Herefter»den appellerede dom«, hvorved Retten frifandt Kommissionen for appellanternes påstand bl.a. om annullation af Kommissio nens beslutning K(96) 2780 endelig udg. af 8. oktober 1996 herefter»den anfægtede beslutning«.

The appellant submits that the fact that, as stated in paragraph 70 of the contested judgment, the Commission, as a result of the further opinion of the CVMP,'greatly facilitated the work of the Council, which, having noted the further opinion of the CVMP, did not oppose the inclusion of somatosalm in Annex II'.
Ifølge appellanten er det i denne henseende uden betydning, at Kommissionen efter ordlyden af den appellerede doms præmis 70, takket være den supplerende udtalelse fra UVP»… lettede… betydeligt Rådets arbejde, idet Rådet, efter at være blevet gjort bekendt med[udtalelsen], ikke modsatte sig optagelsen af somatosalm i bilag II«.

B- The contested judgments rely on those agreements when contesting the validity of Community legislation if the DSB has declared that both that legislation and the subsequent legislation adopted by the Community in order to comply with the WTO rules in question are incompatible with those rules.
B- De appellerede domme fællesskabsbestemmelse i det tilfælde, hvor DSB har fastslået, at såvel fællesskabsbestemmelsen som senere bestemmelser vedtaget af Fællesskabet, navnlig med henblik på at overholde de pågældende WTO-regler, var uforenelige med sidstnævnte« 5.

The Federal Republic of Germany and also Glunz and OSB maintain that the contested judgment infringed the fourth paragraph of Article 230 EC, since the Court of First Instance considered that Kronofrance was‘directly and individually concerned' by the contested decision and therefore held that the action brought by that company was admissible.
Forbundsrepublikken Tyskland, Glunz og OSB har anført, at den appellerede dom tilsidesætter artikel 230, stk. 4, EF, i det omfang Retten anså Kronofrance for»umiddelbart og individuelt berørt« af den anfægtede beslutning og dermed fandt, at denne virksomheds søgsmål kunne realitetspåkendes.

By the contested judgment the Court of First ruled that there was no need to adjudicate on the application for a declaration of failure to act, the subjectmatter of the application for a declaration of failure to act having ceased to exist since, on 25 September 1996, the Commission submitted to the Council a proposal for a regulation including somatsalm in Annex II.
I den appellerede dom fastslog Retten, at det var ufornødent at træffe afgørelse vedrørende påstanden om retsstridig passivitet, eftersom sagens genstand på dette punkt var bortfaldet som følge af, at Kommissionen den 25. september 1996 til Rådet havde oversendt et forslag til forord ning, hvorefter somatosalm skulle opføres i bilag II.

As regards the first of these arguments, it is clear, from paragraphs 202 and 203 of the contested judgment, that the Court of First Instance considered that even if Mr Tzoanos was not formally an authorising officer for payments he was none the less under an obligation, as Head of Unit XXIII.A.3, to effect a preliminary verification of the merits of applications for payment submitted by recipients of subsidies granted by decision of DG XXIII.
Hvad angår det første af disse argumenter fremgår det klart af den anfægtede doms præmis 202 og 203, at Retten antog, at selv om Tzoanos ikke formelt var betalingsanviser, var han dog forpligtet som chef for enheden XXIII.A.3 til på forhånd at efterprøve berettigelsen af de ansøgninger om betaling, som var indgivet af modtagerne af de subventioner, der tildeles ved beslutning fra GD XXIII.

By the contested judgment the Court of First Instance declared that there was no need to adjudicate on the application for a declaration of failure to act, the subjectmatter of the application for a declaration of failure to act having ceased to exist since, on 25 September 1996, the Commission submitted to the Council a proposal for a regulation including somatosalm in Annex II, and also dismissed the claim for damages as unfounded.
I den appellerede dom udtalte Retten for det første, at det var ufornødent at træffe afgørelse vedrørende påstanden om retsstridig passivitet, idet sagens genstand på dette punkt var bortfaldet som følge af, at Kommissionen til Rådet den 25. september 1996 havde oversendt et forslag til forordning med henblik på at opføre somatosalm i bilag II, ligesom Retten frifandt sagsøgte for sagsøgerens erstatningspåstand.

In so far as ICI continues to seek the annulment of the contested judgment, claiming that the Polypropylene Decision was adopted in an irregular manner and that the Court of First Instance ought to have carried out the necessary investigation to establish the procedural defects involved, DSM is still entitled to make those submissions in its intervention, on the ground that those defects should have led the Court of First Instance to find that decision nonexistent.
For så vidt som Hoechst fortsat påstår ophævelse af den appellerede dom og til støtte herfor gør gældende, at beslutningen blev udstedt på ulovlig vis, og at Retten burde have foretaget de nødvendige undersøgelser for at bringe disse mangler på det rene, er det imidlertid berettiget, at DSM støtter disse påstande i forbindelse med interventionen med den begrundelse, at disse mangler burde have foranlediget Retten til at fastslå, at nævnte beslutning var en nullitet.

It appears from the contested judgment that Mr Tzoanos is a former official of the Commission in Grade A 3 who, from 1 July 1989, had been Head of Unit 3'Tourism' in Directorate A'Business development and improvement of the business environment' of the Directorate-General for Enterprise Policy, Distributive Trades, Tourism and Cooperatives(DG XXIII)(hereinafter'Unit XXIII.A.3') paragraph 1 of the contested judgment..
Det fremgår af den anfægtede dom, at Georges Tzoanos er forhenværende tjenestemand ved Kommissionen, hvor han var indplaceret i lønklasse A3, og at han siden den 1. juli 1989 var chef for enhed 3,»Turisme«, ved direktorat A,»Forbedring af virksomhedspolitik«, ved Generaldirektoratet for Erhvervspolitik, Handel, Turisme og Erhvervsdrivende Foreninger(GD XXIII)(herefter»enhed XXIII.A.3«) jf. den anfægtede doms præmis 1.