Examples of using Regarding draft article in English and their translations into Russian
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
Proposal regarding draft article 92.
Conclusions reached by the Working Group regarding draft article 22.
Regarding draft article 7, the substitution of the term"appropriate protection" for"adequate protection" was welcome.
One delegation renewed its concerns regarding draft article 17 and its relationship with draft article 87.
Regarding draft article 2, a definition of armed conflict based on the Tadić definition was too general.
Ms. Czerwenka(Germany) drew attention to the comments of her Government regarding draft article 20 A/CN.9/658/Add.11, para. 9.
The same approach had been followed regarding draft article 7, which concerned the rules relating to the expulsion of stateless persons.
Regarding draft article 11, he considered that the term"satisfaction" and the expression"guarantees of non-repetition" covered different aspects.
The Working Group agreed that, in the continuation of its deliberations regarding draft article 5 at a future session, the following text would be considered.
Regarding draft article 28, his delegation did not believe that a single State could provide competence to an international organization.
It had already shared a number of its concerns,especially regarding draft article 27 and draft article 12, paragraph 3, and thus supported the proposal by Austria and Germany.
Regarding draft article 2, some delegations expressed support for the proposed definitions of"aquifer" and"aquifer system.
The Commission was urged not to ignore its role in that process andto bear in mind the negative impact that its decision regarding draft article 18 would have for a number of developing and least developed countries.
Regarding draft article 8, it was not relevant to cite the procedures for termination in the Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties.
While support was expressed for the Special Rapporteur's recommendations regarding draft article 11, several members expressed doubts as to the reference to an"option" to terminate, withdraw from or suspend the operation of the treaty.
Regarding draft Article 3 one of the scholars observed that the phrase"as appropriate" should be avoided and should be further clarified.
Responding to a question put by the European Union regarding draft article 12(Right to offer assistance), he said that the term"competent intergovernmental organizations" did indeed extend to regional integration organizations, as would be made clear in the commentary.
Regarding draft article 18, there was a need for further discussion as to how self-defence would apply in relation to an international organization.
Regarding draft article 2 on the definition of"State official", he agreed with those members who had stated that subparagraph(e)(ii) should be greatly simplified.
Regarding draft article 21, it was questionable whether the principle of self-defence, an inherent right of States, was appropriate in the context of international organizations.
Regarding draft article 17, some support was expressed for the more general formulation, but most members found the reference to specific grounds to be more useful.
Regarding draft article 15, his delegation believed that the text adopted on first reading contained elements that could be included in a definition of the crime of aggression.
Regarding draft article 14 bis, he said that the capacity to conduct relief operations was significantly hampered if the safety of relief personnel, equipment and goods was at risk.
Regarding draft article 2, the Special Rapporteur observed that all members expressly or implicitly agreed with the need to include a definition of disaster in the set of draft articles. .
Regarding draft article 5 bis(2), it was suggested that the word"potential" be added to qualify"suppliers or contractors", so as to make it clear that the provisions addressed suppliers at large.
Regarding draft article 13(Conditions on the provision of external assistance), it was important in humanitarian assistance matters to respect both the domestic law of the affected State and applicable international law.
Regarding draft article 5 bis(3), it was agreed that the items referred to should be expanded to include other aspects of the procurement process that would be subject to the same requirements.
Regarding draft article 11, on"Prevention, reduction and control of pollution", some delegations expressed the view that the term"precautionary principle" should be used instead of the term"precautionary approach.
Regarding draft article 24, one member had expressed the view that the Special Rapporteur had not understood a Government's comments on the 1984 Convention against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment.
Regarding draft article 12, on monitoring, support was expressed for the addition of the phrase"agreed or" in paragraph 2 because requiring harmonized standards and methodology for monitoring imposed too heavy an obligation on States.