Примеры использования Group recalled на Английском языке и их переводы на Русский язык
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
The Joint Working Group recalled.
The Group recalled that at its first session agreed on the outline of Group's final report.
The Joint Working Group recalled.
The Group recalled that one of its tasks was the updating and upgrading of the Geographical Information System GIS.
With regard to weapons of mass destruction,including nuclear weapons, the Group recalled the position stated in paragraph 90 of the report of the 2000 Group of Governmental Experts on this matter(A/55/281), as follows.
Люди также переводят
The Group recalled that at its first and second sessions, discussed potential partners for possible collaboration.
Concerned at the high projected vacancy rates for UNOCI, andbelieving that the actual rates might well be higher, the Group recalled that the General Assembly, in its resolution 61/276, had requested the Secretary-General to ensure that vacant posts were filled expeditiously.
The Group recalled that it seeks funding, as all of its activities depend on extrabudgetary resources.
With regard to the proposal to replace written meeting records with digital audio recordings, the Group recalled paragraph 29 of section IV of General Assembly resolution 66/233, and stressed that written summary and verbatim records constituted an important part of the documentation used by all members of the Group and other Member States.
The Group recalled that, after long discussions at previous meetings, it had finally agreed on the definition of"reduced visibility.
During the Ispra meeting, the Group recalled that there had been no financial planning to provide budgetary resources for its work.
The Group recalled that the Executive Body had already exercised its authority in this regard, by adopting decision 2002/10 see section A., para. 1(b) of that decision.
Concerning the national approach, the Group recalled resolution 3/4, in which the Conference had endorsed country-led and country-based, integrated and coordinated technical assistance programme delivery.
The Rio Group recalled that the General Assembly had adopted by consensus the resolution approving the current scale of assessments.
With respect to the financing of UNMIL, the Group recalled that the Assembly had approved resources of $427.3 million for the maintenance of the Mission and, as an exceptional measure, had assessed only $213.67 million for the period ending 31 December 2014.
The Group recalled that, under the Charter, all Member States were required to pay the full amount of their assessed contributions on time and without conditions.
Article 5.03: the Group recalled that it had agreed to delete this provision during its twenty-first meeting ECE/TRANS/SC.3/195, annex, para. 14.
In addition, the Group recalled that the deletion of the phrase on light blue flag or board was aimed at encouraging the use of a bright scintillating white light.
The Group recalled that the General Assembly, in its resolution 54/15, had specified that the transfer of cost savings into the Account must not result in budget reductions.
The Group recalled the agreements in the 2005 World Summit Outcome relating in particular to sanctions, the rule of law and the strengthening of the United Nations.
The Group recalled all the efforts, background and achievements at the multilateral level in the fields of GRs, TK and TCEs which had been under discussion since the 1960s.
The Group recalled that nuclear-weapon States, in conformity with article I of the Treaty, had undertaken not to transfer nuclear weapons directly or indirectly to Israel.
The Group recalled that boards could also be used for other purposes than traffic signalization and that the boards referred to in these articles were required to have a diameter of at least 60 cm.
Article 6.19: the Group recalled that the proposal to add a new paragraph 2 was adopted at its twenty-first meeting CEVNI/EG/2013/EG, para. 22 or ECE/TRANS/SC.3/195, Annex, para. 22.
In that regard, the Group recalled the Assembly's request in resolution 66/233 relating to an evaluation of the pilot project undertaken by the Committee on the Peaceful Uses of Outer Space.
The Group recalled that the General Assembly had called in 2002 for a management review of OTP because it was concerned that pivotal management positions at ICTR had been vacant for nearly two years.
The Group recalled the multifaceted humanitarian challenges posed by IEDs and reiterated its concern at the great number of deaths and injuries caused by IEDs, in particular among the civilian population.
In that context, the Group recalled that transparency was not an end in itself, nor was the Register a control mechanism, but rather a confidence-building measure designed to improve security relations between States.
The Group recalled that, when the ad litem judges had been initially appointed, it had not been anticipated that they would be required to serve for more than three years or asked to preside over multi-accused trials.
In that context, the Group recalled that transparency was not an end in itself, nor was the Register a control mechanism, but rather a confidence-building measure designed to improve security relations among States.