Примеры использования Its judgement на Английском языке и их переводы на Русский язык
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
In its judgement, the Judicial Committee said.
The Chamber handed down its judgement on 29 November 2002.
On 22 February 2001, Trial Chamber II pronounced its judgement.
The Appeals Chamber rendered its judgement on 14 December 2011.
On 17 September 2003, the Appeals Chamber rendered its judgement.
Люди также переводят
Trial Chamber III is preparing its judgement in the Nchamihigo case.
In its judgement, the Supreme Court highlighted a number of violations.
On 20 April 2001, the Tribunal delivered its judgement in the case.
In its judgement of 15 August 2008, Rovaniemi Administrative Court rejected the authors' claims.
On 18 December 2004, the Tribunal delivered its judgement in the case.
Trial Chamber II rendered its judgement in the Kupreškić case on 14 January 2000.
However, the court did not assess them nor present them in its judgement.
The Appeals Chamber may deliver its judgement in the absence of the accused.
This case has been completed andthe Trial Chamber is preparing its judgement.
The European Court of Human Rights had delivered its judgement in the Matthews case on 18 February 1999.
In this regard, in its judgement of 17 July 2008, the Supreme Court made reference to the Committee's Views.
On 23 October 2001, the Appeals Chamber rendered its judgement in the appeal.
The Appeals Chamber, in its judgement of 12 June 2002, confirmed the use of an objective test.
In its judgement of 28 September 2011, the Appeals Chamber affirmed Munyakazi's convictions and sentence.
On 17 September 2003, the Appeals Chamber rendered its judgement in the case Prosecutor v. Milorad Krnojelac.
In its judgement, the Supreme Court merely noted the trial court's refusal to allow the author to testify.
The Appeals Chamber may deliver its judgement in the absence of the person acquitted or convicted.
In its Judgement of 13 February 2001, the Court handed down successive rulings with respect to the two paragraphs of article 8.
On 15 July 1999, the Appeals Chamber rendered its judgement on the appeal against the Trial Chamber's judgement. .
Its judgement was partisan and its treatment of statistical material questionable, incorrect or misleading.
In justifying its decision in the latter case, the Court, in its judgement of 2 July 1996, referred explicitly to article 17 of the Declaration para. 37.
In its judgement of 4 February 2013, the Appeals Chamber reversed the convictions of Justin Mugenzi and Prosper Mugiraneza entered by Trial Chamber II on 30 September 2011.
Demonstrate that it, together with its senior management and staff, is not involved in any commercial, financial orother processes which might influence its judgement or endanger trust in its independence of judgement and integrity in relation to its activities, and that it complies with any rules applicable in this respect;
The Supreme Court in its judgement also held that the accession to the Optional Protocol to the International Covenant was unconstitutional.
Demonstrate to the[accreditation body] that it, together with its senior executive and staff, is free of any commercial, financial andother processes which might influence its judgement or endanger trust in its independence of judgement and integrity in relation to its activities, and that it complies with any rules applicable in this respect;