Примеры использования Its submissions на Английском языке и их переводы на Русский язык
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
The Committee thanked Italy for its submissions.
The communicant in its submissions reiterated its request for a hearing.
They note that the State party has not addressed these arguments in its submissions.
The Committee notes that the State party in its submissions has addressed the merits of the communication.
In its submissions of 13 February and 15 June 1995, the State party contests any violations of the Covenant.
On 24 April 2007, the State party provided its submissions on the admissibility and the merits.
In its submissions dated 15 February 2007 and 30 July 2007, the State party recalls the facts of the case.
The State has not refuted these facts in any of its submissions; therefore, the Committee has deemed them valid.
In its submissions of 10 September 2002, the State party holds that the communication is inadmissible.
The Committee accordingly invited the State party to supply its submissions on the merits of the renewed complaint.
For instance, the source in its submissions alludes to the absence of an arrest warrant; the Government does not deny this.
The Committee's concluding observations reflected the concerns that the Office of the Special Representative had raised in its submissions.
The State party reiterated the information provided in its submissions to the Committee prior to consideration.
In its submissions of 21 June 2002, the State party's principal assertion is that the communication is inadmissible.
It notes the State party's confirmation in its submissions that domestic remedies have been exhausted.
In its submissions, dated 11 February and 27 July 1992, the State party argues that the author's allegations are unsubstantiated.
The Committee notes with concern that the State party in its submissions has confined itself to issues of admissibility.
In its submissions, the United States also explained why the statutory baseline requirement was not imposed on domestic refiners as well.
By Note of 2 October 1998, the State party made its submissions on the admissibility and merits of the communication.
In its submissions dated 30 June, 6 October and 13 October 1995, the State party rejects the allegations by CEAR as incorrect and inaccurate.
The Committee notes with concern that the State party in its submissions has confined itself to issues of admissibility.
In its submissions dated 17 October 2012 and 24 May 2013, the State party responded to the author's comments and provided additional information.
By note verbale of 7 July 2003, the State party made its submissions on the admissibility and, subsidiarily, on the merits of the communication.
The State party accounted for the information submitted by the complainant, andthe Egyptian authorities' reactions to it, in its submissions to the Committee of 26 March 2003.
By note verbale of 20 November 2002, the State party made its submissions on the admissibility and, subsidiarily, on the merits of the communication.
In its submissions of 11 August 2003, the State party reiterates its position that the communication is inadmissible and, subsidiarily, unfounded.
By its submission of 21 July 2006, the State party continues to rely on its submissions on admissibility made on 13 April 2006.
In its submissions of 1 April 2003, the State party reiterates its arguments on the inadmissibility of the communication and provides comments on the merits.
The CISG was applicable even ifthe parties had named their contract"Leasing Contract" and the seller in its submissions referred to the contract as a lease.
In its submissions dated 24 November 2011 and 12 April 2012, the State party responded to the author's comments and provided additional opinions of the Refugee Appeals Board.