Примеры использования Representatives observed на Английском языке и их переводы на Русский язык
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
These representatives observed that northern Mitrovica was the only truly multi-ethnic city in Kosovo.
While recognizing the importance of the articles in question, some representatives observed that they did not raise as complex problems as would arise in the area of countermeasures.
Many representatives observed that there were links between ozone-depleting-substance banks and destruction and other environmental issues.
With reference to strategic objective 2(management of existingstockpiles of mercury and mercury-containing wastes to prevent environmental contamination), representatives observed that both the Basel Convention and the Stockholm Convention might provide bases for international action.
Several representatives observed that the geographical location of their countries rendered them vulnerable to well-organized trafficking networks.
At the fourth meeting of the Conference of the Parties,during discussion of the progress that had been achieved in implementing the Convention, some representatives observed that the number of parties submitting notifications and the number of notifications made by parties were lower than expected.
Several representatives observed that in many quarters there was unease because of the persistence of serious socio-economic problems in some of those countries.
At the invitation of the Executive Director of UN-Habitat, representatives observed a minute of silence to pay tribute to the memory of Mr. Millard Fuller, founder and former president of Habitat for Humanity.
Representatives observed that the tradition of the Montreal Protocol was to carry out studies to provide comprehensive information on which Parties could take informed decisions.
Regarding the control measures pertaining to emissions and releases, several representatives observed that Governing Council decision 25/5 provided for a flexible approach tailored to the requirements of different countries, taking into account their different capacities and circumstances.
Several representatives observed that the shared interest of the Montreal Protocol, the Basel Convention and the Kyoto Protocol in the destruction of ozonedepleting substances created opportunities for collaboration.
General comments on this subprogramme were positive; several representatives observed that it was at the heart of UNEP's work, others noted that this subprogramme and subprogramme 2 were mutually reinforcing, another expressed satisfaction that this subprogramme reflected the provisions of the Malmö Declaration, and others commended the subprogramme's modest budget.
Several representatives observed that it demonstrated the need for continuing close cooperation between the Montreal Protocol and the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change and Kyoto Protocol.
Several representatives observed that the Working Group had an obligation to provide guidance to the Implementation Committee and could not simply return the issue to the Committee without doing so.
Representatives observed that the Toolkit was a good basis for provisional guidance but ultimately needed to be more detailed and that a strategy for proper identification of all sources should be included.
Several representatives observed that commercially and technically viable alternatives were available, and they urged parties using methyl bromide, particularly for quarantine and pre-shipment, to make use of them.
Some representatives observed that the Security Council might refer to the court specific cases concerning individuals rather than situations and expressed concern that this possibility was not expressly ruled out in articles 22 and 29.
Some representatives observed that non-financial assistance to middle-income developing countries in the form of technical cooperation, including capacity-building, was also important, particularly in such areas as social protection and governance.
Many representatives observed that UNEP should play an important role in promoting environmental sustainability in sustainable development goals and in the post-2015 development agenda because of its unique mandate and its role in fostering the science-policy interface.
Some representatives observed that the current method of work of the Security Council, which relied heavily on closed informal consultations, prevented potentially affected States from exercising their rights under Article 50 of the Charter at a sufficiently early stage.
Another of those representatives observed that the proposed change was in line with recent developments in environmental law and in keeping with the need to establish a uniform and legally recognizable standard of harm as opposed to a merely objective threshold and would make the draft articles more acceptable to States.
Representatives observed that Article 5 Parties were currently concentrating all their efforts on achieving phase-out of CFCs, which had much higher ODP values than HCFCs, and they did not want to take any decisions that might hinder that process and cause uncertainty for enterprises which had converted from CFCs to HCFCs.
During the ensuing discussion, several representatives observed that the issue was important; one of them expressed his country's intention to draft a decision on the matter that would provide for the establishment of a simple approach to monitoring stockpiling based on national earmarking of stockpiled substances under the supervision of the Implementation Committee.
Some representatives observed that Article 49 of the Charter, which called for"mutual assistance in carrying out the measures decided upon by the Security Council", implied, at the very least, greater efforts on the part of all Member States, especially those States with the necessary means, and international financial institutions to provide assistance to affected States.
Several representatives observed that while they agreed with the proposed recommendation, they wished to highlight the difficulties faced by the Party in its efforts to obtain the necessary data, pointing out in particular that in 1991 the Party had been part of the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics and that the necessary information would have been held by the central Soviet authorities rather than the Party itself.
Several representatives observed that non-Article 5 parties were still requesting criticaluse exemptions for methyl bromide; that, they suggested, was evidence of the difficulty of identifying alternatives to the substance, and a nomination by a party operating under paragraph 1 of Article 5, with less technical capacity and with pressing social and economic issues, should be viewed with sympathy.
The Representative observed that many displaced persons seemed to be suffering from dependency syndrome.
The Representative observed that serious mentalhealth issues were prevalent among the displaced population.
The Representative observes that local reintegration is the preferred approach in Armenia.
One representative observed that constructive dialogue between the secretariat and member States and among member States themselves was crucial, as were informal consultations between the regular sessions.