Примеры использования Was confusing на Английском языке и их переводы на Русский язык
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
It was confusing.
That sentence was confusing!
It was confusing.
Yeah, that text was confusing.
It was confusing.
Maybe your order was confusing.
That was confusing to you?
The unions' approach was confusing.
I was confusing you with our friend, uh, uh, Jack's girl.
That letter was confusing.
The formulation of this statement in the report was confusing.
For some, it was confusing.
Remember one time I told her an Evite she wrote was confusing?
It was confusing because he was totally irresponsible.
Moreover, the reference to“civilian” population was confusing.
General Assembly resolution 1541(XV) was confusing and difficult to implement.
And soon we realised it wasn't just Hanoi's traffic that was confusing.
Only one question was confusing me: I read that“the party of Nagual” did not accept volunteers.
The Indonesian Government's response to the decolonization of Timor-Leste was confusing.
Furthermore, it was noted that the language used was confusing and inconsistent with agreed United Nations language.
It was stated that the use of the words"appropriate security" and"inappropriate" in subparagraph(g) was confusing.
His delegation had difficulties with the present wording of paragraph 1(i), which was confusing and could give rise to divergent interpretations in practice.
He agreed with the United States representative that the explanation in that paragraph of the interaction between articles 3 and 14 was confusing.
Unfortunately for the investigators,witness testimony was confusing and conflicting, and the authorities did not know which group was responsible for the robbery.
He wondered why that was the case, as the situation was confusing to users.
Mr. CRISÓSTOMO(Chile) said that the term"watercourse" was confusing, as shown by the fact that some delegations wished to replace it with"river", which was far too restrictive a term.
The report of theSecretary-General on reduction and refocusing of non-programme costs(A/52/758) was confusing and contradictory.
One concern was that,in its current formulation, paragraph 1, was confusing as it created the impression that third-party effectiveness might be achieved partially.
The division made in article 7 between genocide on the one hand and war crimes andcrimes against humanity on the other was confusing.
The Court of Appeal considered that the evidence concerning termination was confusing and that the question was better left to the arbitrator in Finland.