Примеры использования Working group had discussed на Английском языке и их переводы на Русский язык
{-}
- 
                                                                                        Official
                                                                                    
- 
                                                                                        Colloquial
                                                                                    
At its twentieth session, the Working Group had discussed the form that the instrument being prepared should take.
Ms. Sabo(Canada) said it would be premature to make any decision on the text until the Working Group had discussed it.
At that meeting, the Working Group had discussed outstanding issues relating to the draft convention.
The Chair of the Working Group  on Implementation informed the Bureau that the Working Group had discussed such a way forward.
Mr. AGUILAR URBINA said the Working Group had discussed the issue of transients, referred to by Mr. Ndiaye.
Mr. Kasanda, Chairperson-Rapporteur, introduced the topic by saying that,during its fourth session, the Working Group had discussed the theme of racism and housing.
The Working Group had discussed that problem at length, and the solution proposed appeared in paragraphs(2) and(3) of article 19.
At its thirty-fifth session(New York, 17-28 June 2002),the Commission noted that the Working Group had discussed a draft interpretative instrument regarding article II, paragraph(2), of the New York Convention.
The Working Group had discussed the Initiative, circulated the document, and encouraged its members to send the requested information to the UNECE.
However, the Committee was informed that during its twenty-seventh session, the Working Group had discussed the follow-up situation in each case where the follow-up dialogue was ongoing and that it had  agreed on the action to be taken.
The Working Group had discussed other aspects of the work  at UNECE, and reiterated its support of the activities of UNECE WP.6 and the"MARS" Group. .
During the review of the proposed draft text, the delegation of Germany pointed to the fact that all cranberries on the market were sugared andthat a discussion of the proposed standard should be postponed until the working group had discussed the issue.
Although the working group had discussed the judgement, it considered that the issue was beyond its scope and that addressing it would not be helpful.
A complete consolidated set of legislative recommendations was at an advanced stage of discussion and,with a view to achieving a comprehensive text, the Working Group had discussed additional assets at its eighth session in September 2005.
At its previous session the Working Group had discussed all the articles prepared by the International Law Commission and had  referred them to the Drafting Committee.
The Working Group had discussed the issues of racism and the Internet and the need for complementary international standards relating to racial discrimination, with a view to strengthening the Convention and its implementation.
The Committee noted that in accordance with theagreement reached by the Working Group  at the fifty-first session of the Scientific and Technical Subcommittee, the Working Group had discussed the findings in the report of the Group  of Governmental Experts on Transparency and Confidence-building Measures in Outer Space Activities(A/68/189), with a view to identifying interlinkages in the recommendations contained in that report and in the work  under way in the Working Group. .
The working group had discussed the practice of each treaty body in relation to reservations by States parties to the international human rights treaties, as well as relevant developments in the work  of the International Law Commission.
It was recalled that,at its previous session, the Working Group had discussed variations in the interpretation by domestic courts of the writing requirement of article II(2) of the New York Convention.
When the Working Group had discussed the way forward, several delegations had  once again mentioned the possibility of requesting the International Law Commission to study certain aspects of the question.
The Subcommittee noted that,at its current session, the Working Group had discussed the results of the workshop and developed a preliminary draft report of the workshop see the appendix of annex III to the present report.
The working group had discussed several tax calculation and aggregation procedures and had  suggested changes in the weighting used in aggregating the tax data, in the determination of the tax deductions and in the regression techniques.
Ms. Leblanc(Canada), referring to paragraph 18, said that although the Working Group had discussed the definitions of the terms"unfair competitive advantage" and"conflict of interest", the text did not seem to offer additional clarity.
The Working Group had discussed the results of the dialogue together with the proposed amendment to the Montreal Protocol submitted by the Federated States of Micronesia and Mauritius discussed  above, along with specific proposals put forward by several other Parties.
At its forty-second session, the Commission noted that the Working Group had discussed a proposal aimed at expanding the role of the Secretary-General of the Permanent Court of Arbitration at The Hague under the UNCITRAL Arbitration Rules A/CN.9/665, paras. 47-50.
The Working Group had discussed whether the stay should apply at the time of application for commencement, but had  decided that that could result in damage to the debtor's business, particularly if proceedings were not subsequently commenced.
The Subcommittee noted that the Working Group had discussed potential options for establishing possible cooperation between the Committee and IAEA see A/AC.105/C.1/L.271/Rev.1.
The Working Group had discussed a proposal to expand the role of the Secretary-General of the Permanent Court of Arbitration at The Hague under the Arbitration Rules; however, the Commission had  agreed that the mechanism established in the 1976 Rules should not be changed.
It was recalled that the Working Group had discussed that matter at its previous session(A/CN.9/618, paragraph 33), and the concerns expressed at that time were reiterated.
The working group had discussed the proposal by the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights to create a unified treaty body but had  decided to work  on the assumption that the harmonized guidelines would be used to coordinate the separate treaty bodies as they stood.