Examples of using Directive should in English and their translations into Czech
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
The draft directive should go further than it does.
In the interests of clarity, the directive should be codified.
The Directive should also apply to everyone.
Certain other things in the directive should also be amended.
This directive should be adopted and implemented quickly.
For this reason our group believes that despite the cost, the Directive should pay more attention to protecting water.
The Services Directive should be implemented at the end of the year.
After more than 20 years of implementation, we have identified the areas where improvements are needed andreached the conclusion that the EIA Directive should be reviewed.
In this respect, the directive should prove very helpful to us.
The Directive should also lead to cost optimisation, both in national budgets and on the part of industry, and ensure that the armed forces will be equipped with the best equipment available on the market.
Therefore, it is very important that this directive should lay down the right for men to take at least two weeks paternity leave.
This directive should guarantee that our constitutional provisions on freedom of the media are respected fully and harmoniously in all of the countries of the European Union, and certainly in all of the countries in question.
In keeping with the principle of subsidiarity, the directive should only regulate areas which concern the cross-border mobility of patients.
This directive should have been transposed into Czech legislation by 1 January 2018.
Consequently, the rules prohibiting the relief under the directive should be very specific and aimed at concrete cases.
The directive should ensure higher certainty in resolving double taxation disputes.
It is a challenging equation andso it is only right that the directive should take the differences between Member States into consideration.
The directive should prevent confusion and should not allow any room for'grey' areas.
Regrettably, experience to date has shown that Member States have not interpreted the current directive uniformly, andso I would like to suggest that in the future the guiding principle should not be classification into different categories but the directive should cover basically all electrical and electronic waste.
The framework Directive should be implemented in Member Countries by both sides.
Mr President, since I have limited time, having thanked Mr Krahmer for his hard work, allow me to focus on Amendments 136-139, where some 40 colleagues,including myself, suggest that this directive should include an environment performance standard for large combustion plants, limiting CO2 emissions in the future.
On the other hand, the directive should also ensure that the Union's peripheral regions are able to compete fairly in the emissions trading system.
This directive should represent an impetus to improve national legislation, above all in countries such as my own, where the tide must be turned.
However, it is growing significantly, despite the restrictions, and this new directive should enable new, innovative and secure electronic money services to operate, to provide market access possibilities for new players and to foster real and effective competition between market participants.
Today's directive should therefore have as its legal basis, in my opinion, the general fight against undeclared work in Europe, not immigration in particular.
The controls built into the directive should also guarantee bidders adequate legal protection, promote transparency and non-discrimination in the award of contracts.
The directive should enable Member States- if they so desire- to collect fees from road users for certain(limited) external costs, so that the'polluter pays' principle can finally be introduced in the area of road transport.
I will also draw your attention to the fact that the directive should also include in its scope workers who are legally resident in the EU, in particular, citizens of the Member States which acceded to the EU in 2004 and 2007, and who are still subject to transitional provisions which restrict their access to legal work.
This directive should include the establishment of waste collection systems, which would be obligatory for Member States, and also lay down national bio-waste processing methods in order to avoid less suitable methods, such as landfill and incineration.
And actually, I believe that this directive should be welcomed all the more since, at the same time, that is, last week, 8 December, the Council adopted the common position on the code of conduct, and it made this code of conduct binding, after it had been at a standstill for three years.