Examples of using Friendly solution in English and their translations into Finnish
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
-
Medicine
-
Financial
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Official/political
-
Computer
-
Programming
It therefore appeared that a friendly solution to the complaint could not be achieved.
It is essential to create energy efficient and environmentally friendly solutions.
When a friendly solution is not possible I close the case with a critical remark.
Green Public Procurement(encouraging public bodies to favour ecologically friendly solutions);
In some cases, a friendly solution may be found if the institution offers redress to the complainant.
Another positive development is the increase in the number of friendly solutions, as we have already heard.
When a friendly solution is not possible, I close the case with a critical remark or make a draft recommendation.
In its observations, the complainant accepted the friendly solution and thanked the Ombudsman for his intervention.
When a friendly solution was not possible, the case was closed with a critical remark or a draft recommendation was made.
Sixty-two of these settlements occurred last year, reducing the scope for friendly solutions to be proposed by the Ombudsman.
When a friendly solution is not possible, I close the case with a critical remark, or make a draft recommendation.
In energy produc- tion and consumption and in production of consumer goods, environmentally friendly solutions become more common.
In some cases, a friendly solution can be achieved if the institution or body concerned oT ers compensation to the complainant.
In 129 cases closed in 2008(36% of the total),the institution concerned accepted a friendly solution or settled the matter.
When a friendly solution is not possible, the Ombudsman may close the case with a critical remark or make a draW recommendation.
If the Ombudsman's inquiries reveal an instance of maladministration,if possible he seeksa friendly solution to eliminate it and satisfy the complainant.
Tion, he tries, if possible, to promote a"friendly solution" that will be acceptable both to the complainant and to the institution or body concerned.
The report very much welcomes the fact that the European authorities are increasingly taking action to settle a complaint once they are made aware of the problem in question and that,in other cases, a friendly solution has been arrived at.
The Commission subsequently informed the Ombudsman that a friendly solution had been reached and that the com plainant would be paid the 2,500 ECU which he claimed for his activities during the month of March 1997.
At a meeting held in Strasbourg on 21 October 1997, the Ombudsman and the Secretary-General of the Commission, Mr Carlo TROJAN agreed thatan informal meeting could, in some cases, provide an appropriate way to pursue a friendly solution in cases involving the Commission.
These cases were either settled by the institution or a friendly solution was agreed this compares to 134 cases in 2007, which itself was twice the number of such cases in 2006.
Against this background, the Ombudsman found that the Commission's failure to keep a public register of documents constituted an instance of maladministration. Given that the maladministration did not concern a matter only related to the complainant,it did notappear appropriate to seek a friendly solution under Article 3(5) of the Statute of the European Ombudsman.
The Commission accepted the friendly solution and stated that it would exceptionally consider the complainant's fi le as automatically pre-selected for the inservice training session starting on 1 March 2006.
Given that, because of the Commission's andthe complainant's opposite opinions, it was not possible to find a friendly solution betweenthe parties on this point, the Ombudsman made the draft recommendation set out below.
If a friendly solution is not possible or if the search for such a solution is unsuccessful, the Ombudsman either closes the case with a critical remark to the institution or body concerned or makes a dra recommendation.
In more complex cases in which the Ombudsman makes a preliminary finding of maladministration, he tries, if possible,to promote a“friendly solution” that will be acceptable both to the complainant and to the institution or body concerned.
The Ombudsman proposed a friendly solution which consisted in the Commission taking the necessary measures to ensure that the complainant would receive an appropriate pension entitlement for the full period he had worked for the Commission.
In cases 1858/2005/BB and 1859/2005/BB, the former European Monitoring Centre for Racism andXenophobia accepted a friendly solution in which it provided be4 er information to an unsuccessful tenderer about how his bid compared with that of the winning organisation.
If a friendly solution is not possible or if the search for a friendly solution is unsuccessful, the Ombudsman either closes the case with a critical remark to the institution or body concerned or makes a draW recommendation.
The Ombudsman therefore proposed a friendly solution which would consist in Parliament puming an end to the situation in which the access of auxiliary agents of other institutions to European Parliament premises is restricted without an objective justification. cation.