Examples of using Contested regulation in English and their translations into Polish
{-}
-
Colloquial
-
Official
-
Medicine
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Financial
-
Official/political
-
Programming
-
Computer
The Court should annul the contested regulation in so far as it concerns the appellant.
Before the Court of First Instance, the appellant argued that the Council had lacked competence to adopt the contested regulation.
Item 2 in Column 1 of the table annexed to the contested regulation contains the following description of the goods.
The contested regulation could not, therefore, be based on the powers of the Community in the sphere of the common commercial policy.
III- The jurisdiction of the Community Courts to determine whether the contested regulation breaches fundamental rights.
Nor can it be argued that the contested regulation is designed to attain any Community objectives within the meaning of Article 308 EC.
In the proceedings before the Court of First Instance, the appellant claimed that the contested regulation breached the right to a fair hearing.
Annul the contested regulation in so far as it imposes an antidumping duty on imports of ironing boards manufactured by the applicant;
In contrast, Mr Kadi objects to those requests,claiming that the contested regulation constitutes a serious breach of fundamental rights.
On 27 May 2002, that regulation was repealed andreplaced by Council Regulation(EC) No 881/2002‘the contested regulation.
Column 2 of the table annexed to the contested regulation classifies the goods thus described in CN Code 8528 21 90.
Subsequently, I shall address the pleas concerning the jurisdiction of the Community Courts to review whether the contested regulation breaches fundamental rights.
It follows from all the foregoing that the contested regulation, so far as it concerns the appellants, must be annulled.
The appellant argues that this finding is mistaken in law andmaintains that the Community lacked competence altogether to adopt the contested regulation.
According to the spokesperson, the contested Regulation 1257/2012supports the objectives of the EU and reinforces the integration process as it ensures unified protection.
In addition and in any event, the question of the Court's jurisdiction to rule on the lawfulness of the contested regulation has arisen in fundamentally different circumstances.
The appellant alleges that the contested regulation infringes a number of its fundamental rights and, on those grounds, seeks the annulment of that regulation. .
Consequently, the action should be dismissed as inadmissible in so far as it seeks annulment of items 1, 3 and4 in the table annexed to the contested regulation.
It follows from all the foregoing considerations that the contested regulation is not of individual concern to the applicant and that the action must therefore be dismissed as inadmissible.
In the first part Mr Kadi maintains that the Court of First Instance erred in law in ruling that Articles 60 EC and301 EC could be regarded as constituting a partial legal basis for the contested regulation.
If Article 307 EC cannot render the contested regulation exempt from judicial review, are there perhaps any other rules of Community law that can?
In his Opinion today,Advocate General Miguel Poiares Maduro suggests that the Court set aside the judgment of the Court of First Instance and annul the contested Regulation insofar as it concerns Mr Kadi.
The contested regulation was adopted on the basis of Articles 60 EC, 301 EC and 308 EC in order to give effect, within the Community, to Council Common Position 2002/402/CFSP.
Consequently, in his opinion,the Community Courts have jurisdiction to review whether the contested regulation complies with fundamental rights as recognised by Community law.
Annul the contested regulation in so far as it classifies under CN Code 8528 21 90 the LCD monitor described in item 2 of the table annexed to that regulation; .
Declare that monitors meeting the technical specifications contained in item 2 of the table annexed to the contested regulation should properly be classified in heading 8471 of the Combined Nomenclature;
In paragraph 186 of that judgment, it held that the contested regulation unarguably had general application within the meaning of the second paragraph of Article 249 EC, since it prohibits anyone to make available funds or economic resources to certain persons.
For its part, Al Barakaat based its claims on three grounds of annulment:the first alleges that the Council was incompetent to adopt the contested regulation, the second alleges infringement of Article 249 EC and the third alleges breach of its fundamental rights.
The contested regulation, as amended, provides in Article 2 that‘all funds and other financial resources belonging to, or owned or held by, a natural or legal person, group or entity designated by the Sanctions Committee and listed in Annex I shall be frozen.
The applicant submits that the classification contained in item 2 in the table annexed to the contested regulation, although in the form of a regulation, in fact represents a decision which is of direct and individual concern to it.