Examples of using Contested regulation in English and their translations into Swedish
{-}
-
Colloquial
-
Official
-
Medicine
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Official/political
-
Computer
-
Programming
-
Political
Declare the contested regulation null and void, and.
That regulation has been repealed and replaced by the contested regulation.
The Court should annul the contested regulation in so far as it concerns the appellant.
Before the Court of First Instance, the appellant argued that the Council had lacked competence to adopt the contested regulation.
Finally, the applicant claims that the contested regulation does not provide sufficient grounds;
In accordance with Article 1 of Regulation No 561/2003, the following article is to be inserted in the contested regulation.
Article 52 of the contested regulation repeals Council Regulation(EEC)
III- The jurisdiction of the Community Courts to determine whether the contested regulation breaches fundamental rights.
That the contested regulation is unlawful as a result of the unlawfulness of the decision of 20 November 2017- 14559/17.
No 881/2002‘the contested regulation.
It follows from all the foregoing that the contested regulation, so far as it concerns the appellants, must be annulled.
The contested regulation could not, therefore, be based on the powers of the Community in the sphere of the common commercial policy.
According to the appellant, there is no basis in Community law for restricting judicial control in respect of the contested regulation in this way.
Council amended the contested regulation as regards exceptions to the freezing of funds and economic resources.
In the proceedings before the Court of First Instance, the appellant claimed that the contested regulation breached the right to a fair hearing,
The contested regulation was adopted on the basis of Articles 60 EC,
Nor can Article 60(1) EC furnish the basis for the contested regulation, for its ambit is determined by that of Article 301 EC.
refer thenceforth to the contested regulation, in so far as that measure concerns them.
Nor can it be argued that the contested regulation is designed to attain any Community objectives within the meaning of Article 308 EC.
The Court of First Instance correctly held that Article 308 EC could be included in the legal basis of the contested regulation, jointly with Articles 60 EC
If Article 307 EC cannot render the contested regulation exempt from judicial review, are there perhaps any other rules of Community law that can?
Instead, the Court of First Instance confined its analysis to the question whether the Security Council resolutions which the contested regulation seeks to implement were in conformity with principles of jus cogens.
On 21 April 1997 the contested regulation was adopted unanimously by the Council,
At first sight, it may not be entirely clear how Member States would be prevented from fulfilling their obligations under the United Nations Charter if the Court were to annul the contested regulation.
At the time the contested regulation was adopted, it had not been conclusivelyshown that there was
the United Kingdom agree with the Court of First Instance that the contested regulation finds its legal basis in Articles 60 EC, 301 EC and 308 EC.
The contested regulation, inasmuch as it imposes restrictive measures of an economic and financial nature,
10the Court of First Instance upheld the contested regulation.
Primarily, it considers that the correct legal basis for the contested regulation is Article 100a of the Treaty and, in the alternative,
The heads of claim concerning the part of the judgments under appeal relating to the limits of the review by the Community judicature, in the light of fundamental rights, of the internal lawfulness of the contested regulation.