Examples of using Differing views were expressed in English and their translations into Russian
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
Differing views were expressed.
In that regard, differing views were expressed.
Differing views were expressed.
With regard to draft article 17, paragraph 1, differing views were expressed.
Differing views were expressed in respect of institutional reform.
As to paragraph(b)of recommendation 142, differing views were expressed.
Differing views were expressed as to whether paragraph 2 should be retained.
With respect to recommendation 56, paragraph(c), differing views were expressed.
Differing views were expressed as to how that result might be achieved.
As to the form of the text though, differing views were expressed.
Differing views were expressed with respect to the points of difference between alternatives 1 and 2.
In respect of damages for breach of contract, differing views were expressed.
Differing views were expressed as to whether paragraph 31 reflected an appropriate rule.
As to the particular formulation of that recommendation, differing views were expressed.
Differing views were expressed as to whether paragraphs 2-4 should be retained.
With respect to the rule in the second sentence of recommendation 86, differing views were expressed.
Differing views were expressed as to whether recommendation 19 should be retained.
On the apportionment of expenses, differing views were expressed as to the basis of contributions.
Differing views were expressed as to the inclusion of the exception proposed in paragraph b.
With respect to article 3, appointment of a registrar anda deputy registrar, differing views were expressed.
Differing views were expressed as to whether paragraphs 2 and 3 should be merged.
With respect to the term"registry record", differing views were expressed as to whether it meant information in all notice or just a particular notice.
Differing views were expressed as to whether the opening words of the chapeau should be retained.
However, differing views were expressed as to how that result could be achieved.
Differing views were expressed as to whether illegal fishing constituted a maritime security issue.
Before the Court, differing views were expressed concerning the nature and legal value of agreements between a State and local chiefs.
Differing views were expressed regarding the usefulness of the insertion in the article of a reference to“legal entities”.
Differing views were expressed as to the need for a publicity system for security rights in movable property.
Differing views were expressed concerning criteria for ad hoc adjustment of rates of assessments during a scale period.
Differing views were expressed as to whether the regime envisaged in the draft Guide should cover consumer transactions.