Examples of using To develop weapons in English and their translations into Russian
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
Iraq must abandon efforts to develop weapons of mass destruction.
It was also reported in 2002 that Israeli intelligence provided Washington with alarming reports about Iraq's alleged program to develop weapons of mass destruction.
While the primary value is to develop weapons against God, that occurs under the pretext of the most advanced studies.
But Saddam Hussein has defied all those efforts and continues to develop weapons of mass destruction.
The programmes to develop weapons of mass destruction in the Democratic People's Republic of Korea were not known with precision.
People also translate
On the contrary, a frenzied race is in progress in the region to develop weapons of mass destruction, including nuclear weapons. .
After the departure of Lieutenant General Hussein Kamel, Iraq turned over to UNSCOM and IAEA a large number of documents(the so-called Haider House Farm documents)concerning their programmes to develop weapons of mass destruction.
India does not support, assist orencourage any State to develop weapons of mass destruction and their means of delivery.
Kiribati does not consider it necessary at this time to implement national control lists for goods which may be used to develop weapons of mass destruction.
And we know that many nations still believe it is in their interests to develop weapons of mass destruction or to sell them or the necessary technologies to others for financial gain.
China has always been firm in its policy of not supporting, encouraging orassisting other countries to develop weapons of mass destruction.
One need only look at the headlines of a newspaper to see attempts to develop weapons of mass destruction, terrorism, ethnic slaughter and other war crimes, denial of basic human rights and attacks on democracy.
It is unacceptable for individuals and companies in China, Russia, andelsewhere to enable North Korea to generate income used to develop weapons of mass destruction and destabilize the region.
Any information that may assist a country, individual orother entity to develop weapons of mass destruction or long-range missiles has been treated as sensitive proliferation information requiring protection with regard to access thereto.
In our view,we must find ways to ensure that technology developed for peaceful purposes does not find its way into the hands of those seeking to develop weapons of mass destruction or their means of delivery.
On the subject of Iraq,recent revelations from Iraq regarding its programmes to develop weapons of mass destruction, including nuclear weapons, confirm the extent to which that country is willing to go to deceive the international community and fail to honour its obligations under relevant Security Council resolutions.
It is clearly all the more alarming in a region in which certain countries have nurtured andsponsored terror as an everyday tool of diplomacy and also seek to develop weapons of mass destruction in contravention of their international commitments.
Preventing the proliferation of nuclear weapons andmaterials that can be used to develop weapons of mass destruction, and ensuring the secure and safe use of nuclear materials are essential. Consistent with those policies, one of the steps taken by the Kyrgyz Republic was to bring into force in February 2004 a safeguards agreement with the International Atomic Energy Agency IAEA.
The international community should also stop sales of the scientific and technological resources that enabled Israel to further strengthen that arsenal, orthat aided any other country seeking to develop weapons of mass destruction.
At present, some neighbouring countries andother countries in our region have resolved to develop weapons of mass destruction, thus ignoring their legal obligations and supporting terrorist organizations.
We call on the international community to cease forthwith the selling of technology and scientific materials that might promote Israel's nuclear programme orthat of any other State that seeks to develop weapons of mass destruction WMDs.
Washington, 6 May(Reuters). On Monday, the United States accused three countries- Cuba, Libya andSyria- of trying to develop weapons of mass destruction and warned that it would take steps to prevent them from providing these arms to terrorist groups.
When Vice-President Gore spoke from this podium to the Conference in April,he stated that the indefinite extension of the NPT without conditions would reduce the uncertainty that often leads States to develop weapons or to preserve their options to do so.
The resolution provides the international legal basis for countering the threat of materials which can be used to develop weapons of mass destruction, related materials, technologies and means of delivery falling into the hands of non-State actors, first of all terrorist organizations.
The white paper entitled"China's Non-Proliferation Policy and Measures", issued in December 2003, clearly sets forth China's non-proliferation policy, andreaffirms that China does not support, encourage or assist any country to develop weapons of mass destruction or their means of delivery.
This resolution creates the international legal framework for countering the threat of the emergence of materials which can be used to develop weapons of mass destruction and preventing such weapons, related materials, technologies and their means of delivery from falling into the hands of non-State actors, in particular terrorist organizations.
In paragraph 3 of the resolution the Council calls upon Iraq to provide to UNMOVIC, IAEA andthe Council a currently accurate, full and complete declaration of all aspects of its programmes to develop weapons of mass destruction as well as other chemical, biological and nuclear programmes.
Provide full, final and complete disclosure, as required by resolution 687(1991),of all aspects of its programmes to develop weapons of mass destruction and ballistic missiles with a range greater than 150 km and of all holdings of such weapons, their components and production facilities and locations, as well as all other nuclear programmes, including any which it claims are for purposes not related to nuclear-weapons-usable material, without further delay;
In its resolution 707(1991), Iraq having failed to provide an adequate declaration, the Security Council demanded that Iraq should provide without delay full, final and complete disclosure(FFCD), as required by resolution 687(1991),of all aspects of its programmes to develop weapons of mass destruction and ballistic missiles with a range greater than 150 kilometres and of all holdings of such weapons, their components and production facilities and locations.
Deploring the fact that Iraq has not provided an accurate, full, final, and complete disclosure, as required by resolution 687( 1991),of all aspects of its programmes to develop weapons of mass destruction and ballistic missiles with a range greater than one hundred and fifty kilometres, and of all holdings of such weapons, their components and production facilities and locations, as well as all other nuclear programmes, including any which it claims are for purposes not related to nuclear-weapons-usable material.