Examples of using Whose decisions in English and their translations into Slovak
{-}
-
Colloquial
-
Official
-
Medicine
-
Financial
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Official/political
-
Computer
-
Programming
There are four central banks whose decisions could have a significant impact on the financial markets.
The drawing will be conducted by Sponsor or its designated representatives, whose decisions are final.
Where any such question is raised in a case pending before a court or tribunal of a Member State against whose decisions there is no judicial remedy under national law, that court or tribunal shall bring the matter before the Court of Justice.
Modern man is strapped down by a network of rules and regulations,and his fate depends on the actions of persons remote from him whose decisions he cannot influence.
Judgments and decisions handed down by courts or other authorities whose decisions can be legally enforced, demands for payment endorsed by the bailiff's court, and decisions on the costs of legal actions taken by these authorities.
To keep publicly accessible records of meetings with entities, whose decisions they are trying to affect.
By pooling basic production andby creating a new high authority whose decisions will be binding on France, Germany and the other countries… this proposal will create the first concrete foundation for a European Federation which is so indispensable for the preservation of peace.".
This workshop is mainly intended for higher management and people whose decisions can make a great impact on a company.
Winner(s) of prizes below will be selected from among all eligible entries received in random drawings conducted on orabout 7/16/12 by Ventura Associates International LLC, whose decisions are final.
Winner selection is under the supervision of Sponsor, whose decisions are final and binding in all respects.
By pooling basic production andby setting up a new High Authority whose decisions will be binding on France, Germany and other member countries, this proposal will build the first concrete foundation of the European Federation which is indispensable to the preservation of peace.".
They are not the results of chance butare IMPOSED on him by other persons whose decisions he, as an individual, is unable to influence.
By pooling basic production andby instituting a new higher authority, whose decisions will bind France, Germany, and other member countries, this proposal will lead to the realisation of the first concrete foundation of a European federation indispensable to the preservation of peace.".
That cooperation takesplace however within the framework of a supranational organisation whose decisions are binding on those Member States.
By pooling basic production andthe establishment of a new High Authority, whose decisions will be binding on France, Germany and the countries that join them, this proposal will lay the first concrete foundations of a European federation, which is indispensable to the maintenance of peace".
Because the IoM ispositioned by the federal government as an independent,“prestigious” organization whose decisions are based on scientific facts.
It must be stressed that the assessment of whether a body is a court or a tribunal against whose decisions there is no judicial remedy under national law must not be abstract, but specific and depends on whether the judicial remedy is available in the case at issue.
Clearly, therefore, a morality established upon a maxim of which the practical interpretationis questionable involves the existence of some authority whose decisions respecting it shall be final,- that is, a legislature.
An autocracy is a system of government in whichsupreme power is concentrated in the hands of one person, whose decisions are subject to neither external legal restraints nor regularized mechanisms of popular control.
To insist upon the punishment of persons guilty of endangering the environment,and of officers, whose decisions have infringed their rights or interests;
Members of superior, supreme,and constitutional courts or of other high-level judicial bodies whose decisions are not subject to further appeal, except in exceptional circumstances;
Such an approach should involve many actors,including health and non-health policy sectors and stakeholders whose decisions impact on the mental health of the population.
Consequently, the referring court would be a court or a tribunal‘against whose decisions there is no judicial remedy under national law'.
Judges of the Supreme Court,judges of constitutional courts or of other high-level judicial bodies whose decisions are not subject to further appeal, except in exceptional circumstances.