Примеры использования Author's claim на Английском языке и их переводы на Русский язык
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
The author's claim under article 14, paragraph 5.
The Committee therefore considers that the author's claim is not substantiated.
The author's claim is based on a different assessment of these differences.
In these circumstances, it considers that the author's claim has become moot.
The author's claim against the LAC is manifestly ill-founded and lacking in merit.
Люди также переводят
The Committee notes that the State party has not contested the author's claim.
The decision did not address the author's claim with regard to the legal costs.
The author's claim that his right to appeal was violated is unfounded.
The State party submits therefore that the author's claim is unsubstantiated.
The Committee notes the author's claim that her right under article 26 of the Covenant was violated.
The State party thereby concludes that the author's claim is unfounded.
The Committee has found the author's claim of a violation of article 14, paragraph 1, admissible.
Subsidiarily, the State party argues that the author's claim is illfounded.
The Committee has found the author's claim of a violation of article 14, paragraph 1, admissible.
The Madrid Court No. 6 of First Instance dismissed the author's claim on 10 December 1991.
The State party rejects the author's claim that the interpreter did not translate correctly.
Subsidiarily, the State party argues that the author's claim is ill-founded.
The Committee has noted the author's claim under article 15 of the Covenant see paragraph 2.7 above.
This statute of limitation having expired,the District Court rejected the author's claim.
The Committee has noted the author's claim that the trial of Mr. Arutyunyan was unfair.
Reconsideration of the Committee's decision on admissibility with regard to the author's claim under article 17.
This part of the author's claim is thus inadmissible under article 5, paragraph 2(b) of the Optional Protocol.
The State party therefore maintains that the author's claim is not based on truth.
On 11-12 May 2004, the Refugee Protection Division of Canada's Immigration andRefugee Board heard the author's claim.
The Committee notes that the facts on which the author's claim are based, are not in dispute.
In a ruling dated 17 March 1995, Murcia employment tribunal No. 3 rejected the author's claim.
It notes that the author's claim that he was hit by prison warders was not before the European Commission.
In these circumstances, the Committee considers it unnecessary to examine separately the author's claim under article 6.
As regards the author's claim under article 26, the State party argues that it is inadmissible ratione temporis.
No criminal proceedings have been initiated and the author's claim for compensation appears to have been rejected.