Примеры использования Author's claims на Английском языке и их переводы на Русский язык
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
The author's claims.
On 14 October 2005, the State party contested the author's claims.
It adds that the author's claims distort the rights recognized in the Covenant.
The domestic court considered the facts and rejected the author's claims.
In this respect, therefore, the author's claims do not come within the competence of the Committee.
Люди также переводят
On 17 September 2002,the Supreme Court issued a new judgement denying the author's claims.
The State party contends that the author's claims are contradictory.
The author's claims of inappropriate behaviour of the prosecutor and the judge have not been confirmed.
The State party submits that the author's claims under article 10 are unsubstantiated.
All the author's claims are groundless and based on unverified allegations or mere suppositions.
The State party rejects as unfounded the author's claims under article 14.
The Committee notes the author's claims that proceedings in the Bogotá Regional Court were conducted before faceless judges.
In the absence of such evidence, the State party argues that the author's claims are inadmissible.
In that respect, therefore, the author's claims did not come within the competence of the Committee.
In the alternative, the State party requests the Committee to reject the author's claims as being without merits.
The Committee has noted the author's claims on the alleged bias and partiality of the court in his case.
In the light of this conclusion, it is unnecessary to examine separately the author's claims under article 10 of the Covenant.
The IRB found,inter alia, that the author's claims were not credible and that the story he presented was"a complete fabrication.
It is therefore more appropriately examined at the same time as the substance of the author's claims under articles 18, 26 and 27.
The State party contends that the author's claims"are a deliberate attempt to misrepresent to the.
On October 2004, the State party had submitted that theoffice of the State Attorney and the Government of the Province of Salzburg were examining the author's claims for damages under the Austrian Official Liability Act.
Accordingly, the Committee declares the author's claims in this regard inadmissible under article 2 of the Optional Protocol.
Therefore, contrary to the State party's assertion, the author's claims are sufficiently substantiated.
In light of the above, the author's claims under article 7 and 14 are inadmissible on the grounds that they are not sufficiently substantiated.
The State party submits that the office of the State Attorney and the Government of the Province of Salzburg are currently examining the author's claims for damage/just satisfaction, under the Austrian Official Liability Act.
The Committee considers that the author's claims that the State party knew otherwise were, and in fact remain, speculative.
The author notes that the State party does not contest the author's claims under articles 9(para. 3), 7 and 14 of the Covenant.
As regards the author's claims of violation of articles 24 and 26 of the Covenant, the State party maintains they are not substantiated.
The Committee observes that two of the author's claims were remedied by domestic Courts.
In addition, the author's claims that he will risk detention, torture and possibly execution have not been sufficiently substantiated.