Примеры использования Claimant's claim на Английском языке и их переводы на Русский язык
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
The court granted the claimant's claim.
Prima facie once a claimant's claims are settled, no claim remains to be pursued.
An award was rendered in 2007 in relation to the claimant's claim.
The court dismissed the claimant's claim as being entirely off-set.
As the results of our work the court denied satisfaction of the claimant's claim.
Prima facie once a claimant's claims are settled, no claim remains to be pursued.
Based on the foregoing, the Panel recommends that no compensation be awarded for the claimant's claimed losses relating to the video tape business.
The claimant's claim for tangible property relates to the loss of 22 buses which were registered in the name of the claimant. .
Consequently, the Panel finds that the Claimant's claim for loss of revenues is not compensable.
The claimant's claim for loss of tangible property seeks compensation for the losses which it alleges were caused by the non-Kuwaiti shareholder.
As noted previously in paragraph 67 above, the individual claimant's claim in respect of the business will be further considered by the"D" Panels.
The claimant's claim relates to amounts which it allegedly paid the contractor for surveying the land and for preparing a model of the proposed complex.
Which part of the decision should contain an indication of the claimant's claim, the respondent's objections and explanations of other persons participating in the case?
Iraq submitted written comments on this claim, which raised some specific issues,particularly in connection with the claimant's claim for loss of tangible assets.
However, the court found that the claimant's claim fell under the statute of limitations pursuant to Italian law.
Upon the defendant's appeal, the appellate court reversed the lower court's decision,rejected the claimant's claim and granted the defendant's counterclaim.
The Panel therefore recommends that the claimant's claim for the loss of vehicles should be adjusted to offset this"risk of overstatement.
The Arbitration Court had reached its decision on payment for the losses without hearing additional arguments by the parties because it had found the claimant's claims for payment under the guarantee unfounded.
The Panel finds that the Claimant's claim for interest falls within the scope of Governing Council decision 16, as discussed in paragraph above.
It was further suggested to add at the end of paragraph(1)(a)the words"or the respondent asks that the tribunal determine the claimant's claim on the merits and the tribunal determines that it is appropriate to do so under the current circumstances.
The Panel reviewed the Kuwaiti claimant's claim in the eleventh instalment of category"D" claims and recommended an award of USD 379,782 for the losses of the printing business.
Where no explanation or proof of repayment is forthcoming, the Panel has no option but to conclude that these amounts paid in advance are due, on a final accounting, to the employer, andmust be deducted from the claimant's claim.
Again, in the light of this information, the"E4A" Panel note that the individual claimant's claim in respect of the arcade business will be further considered by the"D" Panels.
The Commission decided that the claimant's claim to payment of a sum. of money representing ethe equivalent of the defects found by the expert des tgnat. ed in the contract between the parties could not be considered a dispute concerning quality; it therefore agreed to arbitrate the case.
Specifically, at the time of the initial review,the Panel had recommended compensation in the amount of USD 7,785.47 for the real property component of the claimant's claim for D8/D9(individual business) losses.
Finally, the Supreme Court noted that the claimant's claim was due on 21 November 1990 and that it was referred to the Foreign Trade Court of Arbitration on 11 July 1994.
And its resolution in case number 17/33-11(19/57-10) dated 09.08.2011,the High Commercial Court of Ukraine upheld decisions of previous instances which denied claimant's claims about termination of loan contract and recovery of losses.
As the Panel is not able to determine if the claimant's claim is duplicative of part of the Government of Kuwait's claim, it cannot recommend that any compensation be awarded in respect of this claim. .
Normally, a claimant is liable for damages if interim measures are granted under the Enforcement Act and it later proves that the claimant's claim was not valid when the application for interim measures was granted.
The Panel therefore recommends that the claimant's claim for the value of the contracts not specifically claimed by PAYS should be adjusted for the"risk of overstatement" arising from this evidentiary shortcoming.