Примеры использования It had been argued на Английском языке и их переводы на Русский язык
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
It had been argued that the Code might infringe the human rights of staff members.
The authors point out that the(Revolt)history appears in the tragedy not as an exclusive movement of people's masses as it had been argued before but acting as a disposition of Providence Divine Providence.
To prevent that, it had been argued that the development of common principles was needed.
It had been argued that data collection activities could be organised in more efficient ways.
Despite these steps to recognize and protect the rights of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples to their land and sacred sites,however, it had been argued that many Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples are unable to benefit from these improvements because in the past they have been dispossessed of their land which has been alienated, their ties to it have been broken and their traditional land-lore has been lost.
It had been argued that the appeals process was not effective because it was rarely invoked.
In the case now under consideration, it had been argued that the situation was under the control of the Palestinian Authority but, regardless of the validity or otherwise of that argument, it failed to address the issue of the Jewish settlements in the occupied territories.
It had been argued that there would be a rebuttable presumption that the treaty in question would continue to apply.
Turning to the criterionof intensity of conflict, he noted that it had been argued with some justification that this criterion was no longer being met outside the battlefields of Afghanistan and Iraq, given the time that had elapsed since the events of 11 September 2001 and the relative infrequency of organized armed attacks against the United States since then.
It had been argued that the Act had reversed the previous position and accorded priority to native title-holders.
It had been argued that a“rogue” prosecutor could emerge, but that was unlikely in view of the qualifications required for the office.
It had been argued that the quality of the dialogue with a State party depended on the preparedness and ability of the delegation itself and not on the list of issues.
It had been argued, however, that such an approach found no support in existing practice and that it would represent too progressive a development of international law.
It had been argued that suspected war criminals should be tried before domestic courts but, according to the Special Rapporteur, only one such trial had taken place.
It had been argued that a consensus negotiating mandate and a universally ratified convention were essential and that insistence on a total ban would prevent progress on any limited ban.
It had been argued in defence of article 32 that it contained nothing but a general provision and that foreign nationals would not be entitled to anything more than what was provided in the law of the State concerned.
It had been argued that the same reliefs should be available under article 15 as under article 17, but that such relief would be granted only on grounds of urgency or on a provisional basis.
It had been argued by Mr. Camara that the only permissible reservation to the Convention was pursuant to article 28, i.e. with respect to the competence of the Committee to receive State-to-State complaints under article 20.
It had been argued, however, that, while many electronic procurement practices could be accommodated through the interpretation of existing laws and rules, undesirable obstacles to the use of electronic commerce in procurement might still remain.
It had been argued that permanent contracts were indispensable in order to ensure the independence of the international civil service and job security and that the proposal might undermine equitable geographical distribution and promote cronyism.
Although it had been argued that the United Nations should reduce its dependence on a few large contributors, that could not be achieved without setting the ceiling at such a low level that the principle of capacity to pay might just as well be abandoned.
It had been argued that pension contribution should be considered as representing an investment and that any increase in the(one-third) share of staff members in pension contribution should be borne by staff and not transferred to Member States through increases in post adjustment.
It had been argued that the increasingly common phenomenon of dual or multiple nationality could not be ignored, and that the elements of practice relied upon by the Special Rapporteur in support of a distinction between different categories of nationals were not conclusive with respect to the question of expulsion.
It had been argued that the use of loaned officers could reduce the Organization's financial burden, and it was true that some countries, especially developing ones, had provided staff members to the Secretariat on a non-reimbursable basis out of genuine concern for the Organization's financial situation.
Often, it had been argued, new technology was not transferred to developing countries until decades after it had been conceived, and the effect of cost-sharing research and development expenses could be to allocate portions of such expenses to developing countries even though any benefits to those countries from such research and development were very remote over time.
It has been argued that such a contract among citizens must contain something for everybody Rawls, 1971.
It has been argued that these disaffected individuals will engage in national and international terrorism.
Furthermore, it has been argued that the catering subsidy represents an acquired right of the staff.
It has been argued that the veto acts as a fail-safe mechanism.