Примеры использования Plotinus на Английском языке и их переводы на Русский язык
{-}
-
Colloquial
-
Official
Plotinus considers Eros being beyond sensuality.
And now it's the Greeks.Epicurus, Plotinus number six.
Plato speaks of it and Plotinus calls it an ancient doctrine, on which Cudworth remarks that.
God as Intellect in the philosophical Theology of Plato,Aristotle and Plotinus.
A special attention in the article is paid for Plotinus' interpretation of the Platonic Demiurge.
The concepts of Soul and Body, dialectics of Mind andSoul were determined before Plotinus' time.
Theology for Plotinus is not only an demonstrative knowledge of the omnibenevolent God, but also a personal experience of reunion with him.
It is hardly necessary to ascend in consciousness, or to become Plotinus, in order to attain the universal Spirit.
Third, it is shown that Plotinus, continuing the line of Plato and Aristotle, gave philosophical theology a new, much more personal character.
When the incarnation is temporary, during those mysterious trances or"ecstasy," which Plotinus defined as.
Plotinus long ago gave them his answer:”Man can cease to become man, and become God; but man cannot be God and man at the same time.”.
This distinction between“essence” and“powers” can be traced back to Philo and Plotinus and, indeed, to the Apologists and Clement of Alexandria.
Despite this Plotinus considered the Protestants as materialistic, cold, fatalistic and monarchical when they made their division between the elect and the reprobate.
His writings of this period are filled with references to Plato, Plotinus, Clement, Philo, Augustine, Aquinas, Shankara, Eckhart, Rumi and other mystics.
For Plotinus, and Iamblichus' teachers Anatolius and Porphyry, the emanations are as follows: To Hen(τό ἕν), The One: Deity without quality, sometimes called The Good.
Every person who has read Neo-Platonic Philosophy knows how its chief Adepts,such as Plotinus, and especially Porphyry, fought against phenomenal Theurgy.
When Plotinus packed the entire cycle of human effort into one phrase-"A flight of the Alone to the Alone"- he used a highly intuitive language, as do the Upanishads.
The article gives an overview of the main stages in the development of philosophical theology in Plato,Aristotle and Plotinus, as well as its central concept- Active Intellect or God.
It is shown that Plotinus first connected the two aspects of the divine, namely the Demiurge-creator and the intelligible paradigm that are described in the"Timaeus," into the single hypostasis of Intellect.
In his attacks on the Platonic theories of substance andforms or in his refutation of Plotinus' theories on the soul, Choumnos tries to prove Christian theological teaching.
Although born in the Hindu tradition, he had a deep knowledge of the Western tradition as well as a great expertise in, and love for, Greek metaphysics,especially that of Plotinus, the founder of Neoplatonism.
Iamblichus, a student of Porphyry(who himself was a student of Plotinus) taught a more ritualized method of theurgy that involved invocation and religious, as well as magical, ritual.
When Cosimo decided to refound Plato's Academy at Florence, his choice to head it was Ficino, who made the classic translation of Plato from Greek to Latin(published in 1484), as well as a translation of a collection of Hellenistic Greek documents of the Hermetic Corpus, and the writings of many of the Neoplatonists, for example, Porphyry,Iamblichus, Plotinus, and others.
The author studies Plato's dialogues"Symposion","Phaedon", Plotinus' treatise"About Eros" equally with the receptions of Eros in the Western European culture, represented by Marsilio Ficino(15th century) and in the Russian philosophy in the works of V.
To say that such men as Ammonius, a genius and a saint, whose learning andholy life earned for him the title of Theodidaktos("God-taught"), such men as Plotinus, Porphyry, and Proclus, were"incapable of distinguishing between the opinions of one philosopher and another, or between the serious thoughts of Plato and his fancies," is to assume an untenable position for a Scholar.