Примеры использования Replying to a question на Английском языке и их переводы на Русский язык
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
Replying to a question concerning minorities, he said that the current situation was being assessed.
Ms. KELLEY(Secretary of the Committee), replying to a question from Mr. O'CONNELL(Ireland), said that the draft resolution had no programme budget implications.
Replying to a question on how to lose belly fat, you must approach it from two different points of view.
Mr. Sorieul(Secretary of the Commission), replying to a question from Mr. Schöll(Observer for Switzerland), said that the expert group meeting would take the form of a colloquium.
Replying to a question raised by Mr. Mavrommatis, he said that China adhered to the principle of pacta sunt servanda.
Mr. Corell(Under-Secretary-General for Legal Affairs, The Legal Counsel), replying to a question put to the Secretariat, reported to the Committee on the preparation of the Repertory of Practice of United Nations Organs and the Repertoire of the Practice of the Security Council.
Replying to a question from Mr. GUILLÉN(Peru), he concurred that synthetic drugs represented a major new threat.
Mr. KASSÉ(Mali), replying to a question about voluntary repatriation, offered to give the Committee a concrete example.
Replying to a question concerning decentralization, he said that programmes on natural resources and energy were still pending.
Mr. Saidov(Uzbekistan), replying to a question about nomads, said that there were no nomadic peoples in the rural areas of Uzbekistan.
Replying to a question from Mr. SICILIANOS, Mr. KJAERUM explained that paragraph 10 reflected the approach of"practical dualism" which was practised in Denmark.
The Chairman, replying to a question concerning meeting venues, responded that the intended meeting venue was New York.
Replying to a question concerning the amendment of the Extradition Act, she explained that the Act prohibited extradition on grounds of political offence.
Mr. Saidov(Uzbekistan), replying to a question about elections, said the Constitution stipulated that participation was voluntary.
Replying to a question by Mr. Wolfrum, Mr. de GOUTTES(Rapporteur for Brazil) said that, in its periodic report, Brazil did in fact refer to ongoing programmes.
Mrs. PATERNOTTRE(Belgium), replying to a question on article 10, said that attitudes to various professions needed to be re-evaluated.
Replying to a question from a member of the Chamber about human rights safeguards, he confirmed that the laws and regulations had not been broken by the police.
Mrs. LAMPEROVA(Slovakia), replying to a question concerning the Prevention of Crime Bill, said that prevention was better than punishment.
Lastly, replying to a question based on allegations by NGOs that women in Peru did not do the same work as men, he reiterated that such was not the case.
The CHAIRMAN, replying to a question put by the Netherlands representative, said he believed that all the rules of procedure had been observed.
The CHAIRMAN, replying to a question from Mr. THORNBERRY, confirmed that the discussion of working methods would be continued at the sixty-first session.
Mr. OUVRY(Belgium), replying to a question from Mr. Kjaerum, said that the concept of Belgian identity did not run counter to any regional or European identity.
Mr. SLONOVSCHI(Moldova), replying to a question asked by Mr. Solari Yrigoyen, said that pacifism certainly constituted a ground for exemption from military service.
Replying to a question concerning the migration of women, including girls, from rural to urban areas, she said that urban migration was not really a new phenomenon.
Mr. JEZOVICA(Slovakia), replying to a question about the case of asylum-seekers who had reportedly been held in police custody for 40 days, said that he had no knowledge of that case.
The Chair, replying to a question from Ms. Del Sol Dominguez(Cuba), said that the working paper submitted by the delegation of Cuba would be included in the list of documents in the final report.
Mr. HALBWACHS(Controller), replying to a question from Ms. SHENWICK(United States of America), said that the report on the premises of the International Court of Justice would be ready in two to three weeks.
Mr. TAKASU(Controller), replying to a question from Mr. JU Kuilin(China), said that the draft decisions contained only financial commitment authority and did not include assessments.
Ms. Maciejewska(Poland), replying to a question concerning the refugee integration programme, said that in accordance with the Law on Social Security, provision of integration assistance to refugees was compulsory.
Replying to a question concerning loss of French nationality, he said that in certain very exceptional cases a naturalization decision could be challenged under article 25 of the Civil Code.