Примери за използване на Commission contends на Английски и техните преводи на Български
{-}
-
Colloquial
-
Official
-
Medicine
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Computer
The Commission contends, in essence, that the fourth plea should be rejected.
In response to Microsoft's assertion that an average of 1.7 media players are used each month by consumers, the Commission contends that consumers cannot replace Windows Media Player by another media player on their PCs, but can only add a second media player.
Next, the Commission contends that the fact that the AS/U technology is still available is irrelevant.
Referring, moreover, to the judgment of 29 April in Tokai Carbon and Others v Commission, paragraph 165 above(paragraph 53), the Commission contends that in the final report the hearing officer was not required to address the details of the complaints of a procedural order.
The Commission contends that the second ground of appeal is in part inadmissible and, in any event, unfounded.
Fourthly, emphasising that the applicants' complaint related to 11 measures, the Commission contends that the accusations of inertia or lack of diligence are unfounded and that, moreover, these complaints form part of the third plea.
The Commission contends that in the present case there is a transfer of State resources in the form of a loss of State resources.
Relying on Adria-Wien Pipeline and Wietersdorfer& Peggauer Zementwerke,cited in paragraph 80 above, the Commission contends that the fact that the recipient undertakings belong to different sectors does not imply that the measure in question is a general measure of economic policy. Findings of the Court.
The Commission contends that the second stage of the examination defined in the judgment in Aranyosi and Căldăraru is applicable.
As regards the reference to the judgment of 29 April 2004 in Tokai Carbon and Others v Commission, paragraph 165 above, the Commission contends that Hoechst seeks to infer from a possible error in treatment concerning the undertakings placed in the second category that it was itself the victim of discrimination.
Still, the Commission contends that the fundamental freedoms and Article 106(2) TFEU are pertinent to the bottled LPG sector.
In addition to the preliminary plea of inadmissibility raised by the Commission and based on the argument that the contested act cannot be the subject of an action for annulment,which must be rejected for the reasons set out in paragraphs 33 to 61 of this judgment, the Commission contends that Athinaïki Techniki filed its application outside of the prescribed time-limits.
The Commission contends that Schneider has not shown that it has been the victim of an exceptional situation giving rise to entitlement to compensatory interest.
As regards the substance of the ground of appeal under consideration, the Commission contends that it was by no means impossible for the appellants to provide evidence in support of their allegation that, during the first inspection, the Commission had also searched for documents concerning the second alleged infringement.
The Commission contends that this plea in law must be treated as serving no purpose, since the applicants are challenging a point which is not in the Decision.
Consequently, the Commission contends that the 1994 bond issue was carried out under market conditions and that the State did not forgo revenue.
The Commission contends that the ground of appeal is inadmissible since it does no more than challenge the assessment of the facts made by the Court of First Instance.
The Commission contends that Microsoft misrepresents Sun's request when it claims that the request related to source code and not interface information.
The Commission contends that giving advice on the spot, as point 4 of Paragraph 14(5) of the ApoG requires, is not needed in order to achieve a high level of quality.
The Commission contends that the present application is inadmissible inasmuch as the contested measure cannot be regarded as an act amenable to challenge under Article 230 EC.
The Commission contends that that same rate was‘used' in another case and that the Polish authorities‘accepted' that the same method of fixing the interest rate be followed.
The Commission contends that the letter of 7 June 2006, in which it fixed the interest rates to be applied to recovery of the aid in question, is not a challengeable act.
The Commission contends that in any event the criteria recognised by the Court of Justice in Magill and IMS Health, paragraph 107 above, are also satisfied in this case.
The Commission contends that the anticompetitive agreements were conceived, directed and encouraged by the directors of the undertakings concerned at a very high level(recital 323 to the Decision).
The Commission contends that an adequate statement of reasons was given for the contested decision and that the applicants' complaints stem from their fundamental disagreement with the reasons for that decision.
The Commission contends, by contrast, that the General Court explained the objective, actual and specific risk that that disclosure would entail for its ongoing decision-making processes in paragraph 96 of that judgment.
The Commission contends that the applicants' third, fourth and sixth heads of claim(see paragraph 28 above) are inadmissible since they do not come within the scope of the review of legality based on Article 230 EC.
The Commission contends that the contested requirements fall within the scope of Article 28 EC, that they constitute a measure having an equivalent effect to a quantitative restriction on imports, and that that restriction is not justified.
Alternatively, the Commission contends that, before resorting to Article 308 EC, it is necessary to examine the applicability of the articles of the EC Treaty dealing with the common commercial policy and the free movement of capital and payments.
The Commission contends that Directive 97/13 provides for amending the terms of licences and increasing the number issued, and that the directives on public contracts on which the applicants rely are not applicable to the present case.