Examples of using Amendment would in English and their translations into Czech
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
In which case the First Amendment would apply.
Furthermore, this amendment would greatly complicate the possibility of reaching agreement with the Council.
However, this amendment is not worded appropriately for meeting this objective and, moreover,adoption of this amendment would result in the demise of the whole compromise.
Adoption of this amendment would represent fundamental progress.
That amendment would have made our specific commitment in this extremely delicate and crucial area even more valid.
In any case, for employers, the amendment would bring many problems in practice.
Such an amendment would have legal and economic consequences far beyond the Member State concerned.
The word would be'transitional', and the amendment would then read as follows:'except for temporary, transitional derogations.
The amendment would then read:'Underlines the importance of full regional economic cooperation and the obligation to comply with and fully implement the provisions of the CEFTA Agreement.
IT Madam President, ladies and gentlemen,I ask whether the proposer of the amendment would agree to remove the two phrases which currently read:'in some rare instances' and'which may not be lawful' from the sentence.
An amendment would reduce the threshold values from 40 000 to 30 000 for laying hens, 24 000 for ducks and 11 500 for turkeys.
The constitution amendment would call for a government of three consuls.
The amendment would, however, tend to weaken the impact of the measure in providing incentives to beet processors to dismantle their plant.
However, such an amendment would not put us in an irreversible position for all newer recordings.
This amendment would also open the door to a large-scale grey market and must therefore be absolutely rejected.
The debt relief amendment would allow debtors to go through debt relief irrespective of the size of their debt.
This amendment would have given the opportunity for the EU to back up its words of condemnation with positive action and to deny support for such schemes.
The adoption of this amendment would be an important step in the fight against the death penalty throughout the world.
The amendment would have been essential to understand the scale of the debate on lobbying, not just as a reminder to the Commission but also to a wider audience.
The adoption of the amendment would thus be a welcome change, with the potential, among others, to encourage the desired development of infrastructure.
The amendment would allow a wider use of preventive vaccinations against bluetongue and this will ensure better control of the disease and lessen the burden it causes to the agricultural sector.
One of the effects of the amendment would be to exclude revenue-generating projects funded by the Cohesion Fund from the scope of Article 55.
The original wording of the amendment would abolish the waiting period altogether- employees would be entitled to wage compensation at 60% of the adjusted average earnings starting from the first day of sickness.
Under these circumstances, the aforementioned amendment would propose that this decision be abrogated until 2012, so that the Portuguese authorities can complete scientific studies determining whether or not this decision is justified.
These amendments would lend the report a completely different character.
These amendments would drastically improve the situation, especially as regards control and our stance on the problem of illegal fisheries.
I have voted in favour of this report, because the amendments would increase the European Parliament's powers of control.
The amendments would also mean an increase in the cost of the industrial restructuring of existing refineries which the reform would involve, at the same time as more generous direct compensation to players on the sugar market.
These amendments would restore the guarantee of users' rights, place the obligation of monitoring on domestic regulators and make illegal the arbitrary blocking and discretionary restriction of citizens' access to applications, services and content published on the Internet.
I believe, as several Members have said,that not adopting these amendments would constitute incomprehensible inconsistency on the part of a European Union that, on the one hand, wants increased participation in certain areas, to which it ascribes growing importance, while on the other resists allocating the funds necessary for actually acknowledging this growing importance.