Examples of using Asylum procedures in English and their translations into Czech
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
Asylum procedures must be dealt with immediately and in the best possible way.
This will remain a pious hope until common asylum procedures are adopted.
Asylum procedures must be fit for purpose and they must be implemented with great care.
Only a few Member States could identify the full cost of asylum procedures.
Safe and efficient asylum procedures are required for people in need of protection.
The European Union urgently needs coordinated,fair and efficient asylum procedures.
We were particularly concerned about this, because asylum procedures can take many years in some Member States.
Mr President, ladies and gentlemen,the first stage will be reached this week in the recasting of the Asylum Procedures Directive.
The Asylum Procedures Directive is an essential element of the common European asylum system that will need to be established before the end of 2012.
Italy is having the greatest of difficulties in ensuring that proper reception and asylum procedures are followed.
By contrast, the proposals for a revised Dublin Regulation and Asylum Procedures Directive require only the appointment of a“legal representative” and not of a“guardian”.
RO Mr President, I, too,feel it is important to recast Directive 2005/85/EC as the process for establishing minimum standards on asylum procedures must be fairer and more efficient.
If we introduce quotas for asylum procedures, instead of sending the migrants back immediately, we are just creating incentives for similar behaviour in the future.
We also managed to further develop legal safeguards in the asylum procedures from arrival to recognition.
We would also stress the fact that this proposal for a directive includes aspects that will end up restricting the right to asylum and applying conditions to it, above all,limiting each Member State's sovereign right to make its own choices and decide on its own asylum procedures.
The Commission carried out extensive research at the time of the preparation of the Asylum Procedures Directive proposal, in line with the requirements on impact assessment.
Consequently, as a number of MEPs have mentioned, there will in fact be texts on legal immigration andtexts to strengthen our asylum procedures and our reception of refugees.
If, nevertheless, they do come in,let us greatly accelerate the asylum procedures of these so-called refugees and send them back as soon as possible to the countries in and around Barbary.
One of the recurring criticisms by Member States of the proposed recast of procedures is that it will lead to an unnecessary financial burden on them, but there is a significant body of evidence- andI pay tribute to what the Commission said on the Solihull project in the United Kingdom- that front-loading asylum procedures leads to better decisions at first instance; quality decision making is a key element which we must not miss.
We call for respect for clear, fair,effective and proportionate asylum procedures, and we call for the implementation of a permanent system of visits and inspections of detention centres.
I therefore have this question for the Council and the Commission:how are you going to ensure that you rescue the Asylum Procedures Directive from the doldrums without sacrificing quality?
I support the proposed amendments to the Reception Conditions Directive, to the Asylum Procedures Directive and to the Asylum Qualification Directive in order to clarify the criteria allowing asylum seekers to qualify for international protection.
Parliament addressed five questions to the Council, andsince they all deal with the Commission's proposal for a recast of the Asylum Procedures Directive, I suggest we debate these five questions as one.
My second point is this: we have often asked for information campaigns so thatpeople know how asylum procedures work, what legal immigration means and what the consequences are of a rejected asylum application or illegal immigration.
As you have very accurately pointed out in the questions submitted,the proposal for a recast of the Asylum Procedures Directive contains a particularly high number of problematic issues.
However, the Council,of course, remains committed to continuing its work on the proposal for the amendment of the Asylum Procedures Directive, and I would like to thank you for the work you have done so far, and I am confident that the Commission will incorporate the observations you have made so far in the new proposal.
Parliament acts as co-legislator in this field, andI believe that we must exercise our role in order to harmonise asylum procedures at a higher level, pushing for a system of harmonisation that allows for large numbers to be received and improves standards of reception in the Member States so that the system is increasingly cohesive.
I made no reference in my question to the costs of the asylum procedure.
The importance of a proper common asylum procedure and corresponding status cannot be over-emphasised.
The status and activities of officials involved in the asylum procedure.