Examples of using Sequestration in English and their translations into Czech
{-}
-
Colloquial
-
Official
You understand? No more sequestration.
Carbon sequestration is enormously expensive.
You understand? No more sequestration.
The sequestration last year delayed a lot of people ahead of me.
Could be splenic sequestration, tuberculosis.
Cars bomb, home-loving explosives, sequestrations.
Sequestration of evidence was authorised by Gill Biggeloe, leading legal counsel to Anticorruption Unit 12.
How are we gonna deal with the sequestration problem? Okay.
I'm very proud of my colleagues on both sides of the aisle who voted for sequestration.
How are we gonna deal with the sequestration problem? Okay, uh,-: Keep digging.
An extraordinary and unwarranted step. Jury sequestration is.
Esophageal atresia, pulmonary sequestration, spina bifida boy, spina bifida girl, and teratoma cutie, so great.
Or diaphragmatic eventration. Could indicate bronchopulmonary sequestration.
Could indicate bronchopulmonary sequestration or diaphragmatic eventration.
And teratoma cutie, so great. spina bifida boy, spina bifida girl, Esophageal atresia, pulmonary sequestration.
As we drive renewable technologies, carbon sequestration technologies must go hand-in-hand.
Spina bifida boy, spina bifida girl, and teratoma cutie, so great. Esophageal atresia, pulmonary sequestration.
Here agriculture can play a key role in carbon sequestration and can contribute to the 2020 targets.
Feline Corneal Sequestration- it refers to the development of an opaque, dark brown to black plaque on the cornea, which is a dead piece of corneal tissue.
They try to run when one talks about carbon sequestration, particularly afforestation and avoided deforestation.
Thirty to thirty-five per cent of CO2 greenhouse gas reductionswill come from renewables, while at best only 10% will come from carbon sequestration and 10% from nuclear.
The report itself does not address the vast removal and sequestration system that the US Navy had put in place during the terms of President George W.
A recovery plan of EUR 5 billion is not a recovery plan since 50% of the projects on the list will see no investment in 2009 or2010 because the licences for carbon sequestration, for example, will not be in place!
Mineral sequestration of CO2(the fixation of CO2 in the form of inorganic carbonates) is a potential climate abatement technology which could in principle be used by the same categories of industrial installation as can use geological storage of CO2.
Because- and some have said this- this is EUR 150 million for the decentralised, the local, energy investments, where, on the other hand,we have billions- one billion for carbon sequestration, for example.
As we rapidly exhaust our planet's capacity to absorb CO2 through biological sequestration, we look to our own ingenuity with new sequestration technologies, particularly the potentially transforming technology of CCS, if through these 12 projects the environmental integrity and commercial viability of these processes is proven.
But, if, true to form, the EU nonetheless decides to meddle in this national issue,then one initiative it could consider is to introduce a payment to farmers in return for providing carbon sequestration in soil management and farming practices.
In our view, a low carbon economy- here I am also addressing the President of the Commission- cannot be a nuclear economy; funding and wasting time on a new nuclear future which does not exist yet oron expensive technologies of uncertain application such as carbon sequestration and storage are actually in direct competition with the true renewable energies which we should encourage and fund: sun and wind energy, and energy saving, this latter being the most promising prospect for innovation and employment.
We concentrated on highlighting the problems of recovery of bio-waste in the form of waste incineration with energy recovery, stating that the recycling of bio-waste is far preferable to incineration, as not only does it avoid the formation of methane gas butit also contributes to combating climate change via carbon sequestration and the improvement of soil quality.
So how can it be that we are designing a SET Plan- and earmarking money at EU level- that basically gives a lower share to renewables than the market is already uptaking today,while diverting the money to carbon sequestration and to nuclear fusion, which is not addressed in this paper but which receives by far the largest share of EU money?