Examples of using State in question in English and their translations into Russian
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
The President should convene a meeting of the Council to hear the State in question.
That, according to the State in question, is a fundamental flaw in the draft articles.
It is not used outside perimeter-marked areas located on the territory of the State in question.
Where the State in question was not a party to the relevant treaty or instrument;
The State in question has also requested that State practice should be reexamined and the results reflected in the commentary.
The purpose of sanctions should be to persuade the State in question to cooperate with the international community.
The point of a report was to criticize, butin the context of dialogue with the Member State in question.
By any of its nationals or, if the State in question deems it advisable, by stateless persons who have their habitual residence in its territory;
This general definition does not enable the nature of the link between the citizen and the State in question to be determined.
The State in question had the recourse to withdraw from the treaty and must be treated as intending to be bound by it if it did not exercise that right.
The exporting Party shall not allow any further exports of mercury[or mercury compounds] to the State in question until the confirmation is received.
The Member State in question has seen a range of 50 euros per month for unskilled voluntary fighters to 1,500 euros per month for more skilled members.
That wording was not sufficient to safeguard the life of the expelled person, as the State in question might not abide by the assurance given.
That of course presupposed that the State in question had taken the necessary steps to comply with that obligation, in accordance with international law.
One classic requirement for granting nationality to natural persons was that they must be genuinely linked to the State in question.
Performance of this unilateral act is not required when the State in question does not wish to terminate, withdraw from or suspend the operation of the treaty.
No negative decision was taken by theCommittee in any of the cases, although in two cases the Committee indicated that it would revert to the Member State in question.
Too often, however,their information is neglected or rejected by the State in question and does not lead to action or further investigation.
The ambiguous statement that they must be adopted where necessary leaves the decision as to whether special measures are called for to the judgement of the State in question.
Performance of this unilateral act is not required when the State in question does not wish to terminate or withdraw from the treaty or to suspend its operation.
Unless the State concerned withdrew its reservation, the depositary should inform all the parties about its communication with the State in question.
It was true that, for responsibility to arise under articles 12 and 13, the State in question would need to be acting in breach of an international obligation.
Immediate and effective technical assistance should be provided to address the difficultiesidentified during the review, assuming that the State in question agreed to it.
The same was true of paragraph 3 of article 17: it was important that the State in question should delay implementation of the planned measures until the end of the consultations or until the dispute had been settled.
Although the text itselfincluded no express limitations, it was implicit in the article that it intended to refer only to acts of torture committed by the State in question.
Timor-Leste stated that the allocation of money from the VFFTA should be made in accordance with the needs of the State in question and based on specific requests for support for specific programmes.
The State in question must be recognized by Kenya and bring the action to enforce private rights vested in its head of State or an officer performing a public function.
For example, the United Nations and regional treaty bodies increasingly accept allegations made in communications to be true when the State in question does not counter them.