Examples of using Codeshare in English and their translations into Romanian
{-}
-
Colloquial
-
Official
-
Medicine
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Computer
-
Programming
The codeshare agreement between Swiss and SAS.
Here you find a list of all our codeshare partners.
It also has a codeshare agreement with Qantas covering three routes.
Morocco: Royal Air Maroc andBritish Airways Sign New Codeshare….
Using its own code, the codeshare airline is thus enabled to expand its network of destinations.
Different rules and fees may be applicable to flights operated by partner airlines(codeshare) and to charter flights.
Codeshare agreements with foreign partner airlines are in place for several international routes.
Resulting from a partnership agreement between airlines, a codeshare company is entitled to market the seats of another carrier.
Regular flights are offered by TAROM airline companies,romanian national airline company and ALITALIA which opperates in codeshare.
Codeshare is a flight with an Austrian flight number displayed with a four digit number(OSxxxx), but the flight is operated by an airlines partner.
In addition, this company also collaborates with British Airways, Cathay Pacific, Iberia andQatar Airways in terms of Codeshare agreements.
Lastly, there is no‘single marketing strategy' under the codeshare agreement-- each carrier sells its own tickets through its own channels.
This promotion is valid for all destinations operated by Malaysia Airlines flying out from Malaysia,excluding codeshare flights.
The codeshare agreement makes no provision for‘joint hub system organisation'-- each carrier operates its own hub according to its own priorities.
As has been stated in paragraphs 101 to 103 above,the Commission was justified in taking into account the codeshare agreement between Swiss and LOT in its assessment of the waiver request.
Airport on a codeshare flight operated by Qatar Airways' codeshare partner then in that case the Tarmac Delay Contingency Plan of the operating airline will apply.
The Court notes in that regard that, as the applicant maintains andthe Commission acknowledges, the codeshare agreement and the cooperation agreements are different in scope, content and contracting parties.
Airfares operated under codeshare arrangements with other airlines, for the avoidance of doubts if the flight operated by Qatar Airways but booked under other airline ticket whether it is under Qatar Airways code or not.
In addition, the Commission failed to conduct its own investigation of price developments and the level of competition, or even to engage withthe Trustee in a meaningful way, preferring instead to assume that codeshare agreements restricted competition.
Consideration should therefore be given to whether the codeshare agreement between Swiss and SAS has sufficiently close links with the contractual relationships and competition problems addressed in the 2005 Decision.
Furthermore, according to recital 95 of the contested decision,‘even if the conditions for requesting a waiver of the commitments in the two routes were considered fulfilled', account would still have to be taken, in the assessment of the waiver request,of the introduction of that codeshare agreement.
Should a similar transaction be notified today, the codeshare agreements between Swiss, SAS and LOT may raise competition concerns and the parties may have to offer commitments to remove those concerns…'.
The Court finds that the applicant has not produced objective, relevant and consistent evidence establishing that the Commission had used the waiver procedure as leverage, with the sole orprincipal aim of forcing Swiss to terminate the codeshare agreement with LOT so as to evade the procedures for investigating and sanctioning infringements of Article 101 TFEU.
As to the possible impact of such codeshare agreements on competition on each of the two routes, the Commission considers that these existing codeshare agreements are relevant for the assessment of the merger.
Even though the Commission claims to have found that the prices offered by the operating carrier were almost identical to prices offered by the marketing carrier for codeshare seats on the same flight, the applicant relies, without being contradicted, on price differentiation among flights operated by different carriers on the same day.
The Commission nevertheless submits that the codeshare agreement and the Bilateral Alliance Agreement both form an integral part of the broader contractual relationship underlying the assessment of the ZRH-STO route and are therefore relevant for the applicability of review clause 15.2.
The Commission had found in the 2005 Decision that, in view of the series of cooperation agreements entered into with Lufthansa,LOT had little incentive to compete with Swiss. The codeshare agreement is thus likely to be relevant for the purposes of assessing competition on that route, irrespective of whether or not that agreement can ultimately justify rejection of the request.
By contrast, the codeshare agreement is a standard air-transport industry agreement under which Swiss, in addition to selling tickets on Swiss-operated flights, can also sell tickets under its own designator(that is to say, as‘marketing carrier') on flights operated by SAS, and vice versa.
The applicant observes, in that regard, that in February 2011 theCommission opened a proceeding, on its own initiative, against codeshare agreements covering hub-to-hub routes concluded between Lufthansa and Turkish Airlines, and between Brussels Airlines and TAP Air Portugal, but that after investigating those cases as a matter of priority for five and a half years, the Commission had still not reached any conclusion.
Assuming that the codeshare agreement may be considered relevant for the applicability of review clause 15.2, it remains necessary to verify whether that agreement is such as to establish that SAS cannot be regarded as a competitor of Swiss or, at the least, to restrict competition between Swiss and SAS.