Examples of using Copyleft in English and their translations into Slovak
{-}
-
Colloquial
-
Official
-
Medicine
-
Financial
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Official/political
-
Computer
-
Programming
No Weakening of GCC Copyleft.
Copyleft is a particular Copyright.
This idea is known as Copyleft.
Copyleft applies only when a person seeks to redistribute the program.
This principle is known as copyleft.
The GNU General Public License is a free, copyleft license for software and other kinds of works.
The rules of THATCamp, ideally, are like that, or like the rules of copyleft.
Listen and download hq, copyleft mp3 music.
The company should also“encourage copylefting” and“direct GitHub to promote correct and clear use of licenses andthe best use of copyleft(GPV version-3-later).”.
Listen and download hq, copyleft mp3 music.
Copyleft/Share Alike: If you make modifications or additions to the page you re-use, you must license them under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share-Alike License 3.0 or later.
This app allows you to download free music from copyleft public websites.
An alternative method of satisfying the copyleft is to provide a written offer to provide the source code on a physical medium(such as a CD) upon request.
For that reason,in 2001 they abandoned the GPLv2 in favor of less restrictive copyleft licences.
We believe there are importantreasons why it is better to use copyleft, but if your program is non-copylefted free software, we can still use it.
It also ensures that unlimited redistribution rights are not granted,should any legal flaw be found in the copyleft statement.
Contributions remain copyrighted to their creators, while the copyleft licensing ensures that the content will always remain freely distributable and reproducible.
Copyleft thus uses copyright law to accomplish the opposite of its usual purpose: instead of imposing restrictions, it grants rights to other people, in a way that ensures the rights cannot subsequently be taken away.
It complements the GNU General Public License, which is a copyleft license designed for free software.
David A. Wheeler argues that the copyleft provided by the GPL was crucial to the success of Linux-based systems, giving the programmers who contributed to the kernel the assurance that their work would benefit the whole world and remain free, rather than being exploited by software companies that would not have to give anything back to the community.
We believe there are importantreasons why it is better to use copyleft, but if your program is noncopylefted free software, it is still basically ethical.
Some observers believe that the strong copyleft provided by the GPL was crucial to the success of Linux, giving the programmers who contributed to it the confidence that their work would benefit the whole world and remain free, rather than being exploited by software companies that would not have to give anything back to the community.[6].
Like Wikipedia, contributions remain the property of their creators, while the copyleft licensing ensures that the content will always remain freely distributable and reproducible.
The original copyright holders for a work of free software, even copyleft free software, can use dual-licensing to allow themselves or others to redistribute proprietary versions.
The owners of the original copyright of a certain free software,even if released with copyleft, can use a double license to let both them and others can redistribute their own versions.
However, this will only happen if CC-BY-SA ismodified to make it more explicitly a"strong copyleft" license for embedded media, requiring the surrounding content to be licensed under CC-BY-SA.