Примеры использования Grounds for believing на Английском языке и их переводы на Русский язык
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
There are reasonable grounds for believing that that person intends to leave Hong Kong; and.
If it is shown that these criteria are met or,there are at least reasonable grounds for believing that such is the case, asylum is granted.
Moreover, there were no grounds for believing that the domestic remedy would be unreasonably prolonged.
A decision to waive the right to counsel would be ignored by the prosecutor if there were grounds for believing that it had been taken under duress.
However, there are no grounds for believing that we are going to be similarly impervious to such influences in the future.
Люди также переводят
According to information on the situation of the accused, there are substantial grounds for believing that he will evade prosecution or enforcement, or.
If there are substantial grounds for believing that the foreign national will be subjected to torture or humiliation in his or her country.
The Committee must decide, pursuant to paragraph 1 of article 3,whether there are substantial grounds for believing that Mr. Mutombo would be in danger of being subjected to torture.
There must be substantial grounds for believing that the author's rights under article 7 would be violated in the receiving country.
Moreover, counsel refers to his initial communication andargues that individual grounds for believing that the author would be in danger of torture exist.
In considering a request for the extradition of an alleged offender pursuant to this Convention,the requested State shall consider whether there are any substantial grounds for believing.
There are grounds for believing that the life or liberty of the alien would be in jeopardy in the State to which he or she would be expelled, or that he or she would be subjected to torture or to inhuman or degrading treatment;
The Committee therefore considers that there are substantial grounds for believing that the complainants would be subjected to torture if returned to Iran.
The extradition laws of the United Kingdom which extend to the Isle of Man remain in place as do the legal andprocedural safeguards which prevent extradition of an individual to another State where there are substantial grounds for believing that he or she might face torture.
Thus, there are no substantial grounds for believing that he would be in danger of being subjected to torture in his country of origin.
Under article 3 of the Convention,no State party could extradite a person if there were substantial grounds for believing that that person might be subjected to torture.
Consequently, there are no substantial grounds for believing that the complainant would be in danger of being tortured if he returned to Togo.
The person in question may be detained for up to three days even in the absence of the request referred to in the first part of this article if there are legitimate grounds for believing that he committed an offence in the territory of another State entailing extradition.
According to the complainant,there are substantial grounds for believing that he would be subjected to torture if returned to Iran, in violation of article 3 of the Convention.
In this regard, the Committee recalls that the mere fact that the first complainant would be arrested, retried and possibly convicted in Sri Lanka would not as of itself constitute torture within the meaning of article 1, paragraph 1, of the Convention; norwould it constitute substantial grounds for believing that any of the complainants would be in danger of being subjected to torture in the event of their return to Sri Lanka.e.
Counsel concludes that there are substantial grounds for believing that the author would be subjected to torture if returned to Peru.
However, there are grounds for believing that the majority of workers who leave their jobs voluntarily do so because of lengthy stoppages in production and irregular payment of wages.
Furthermore, the State party submits that there are no substantial grounds for believing that the complainants would be subject to torture upon their return to China.
Persons in respect of whom there are adequate grounds for believing that they have committed a grave crime of a non-political nature outside of the Republic of Tajikistan before arrival in its territory and who are applying for refugee status;
On 17 July 2011,the complainant reiterated her initial claims that there are substantial grounds for believing that she will be tortured in Burundi if she has to return.
The complainant maintains that there are substantial grounds for believing that he would be subjected to torture if he were returned to the Libyan Arab Jamahiriya and that, consequently, his expulsion to that country would constitute a violation by Switzerland of article 3 of the Convention.
The State party claims that the author's arrest and pretrial detention were lawful,as a criminal case for bribery had been opened on 12 July 1999 against him; that there were grounds for believing that he was a leader of a criminal group, and that the investigators had information that he exercised pressure on witnesses of the case.
In Korban v. Sweden, the Committee against Torture found substantial grounds for believing that Korban would be in danger of being subjected to torture if returned to Iraq based on the serious human rights situation in Iraq, his history of detention in that country and his son's defection from the army.
As for the risk faced by the author, the State party refers to the principle, laid down by the Committee in the case Seid Mortesa Aemei v. Switzerland,that it has to determine"whether there are substantial grounds for believing that[the author] would be in danger of being subjected to torture[in the country to which he is being returned]" and"whether he would be personally at risk.