Примеры использования Parties to a treaty на Английском языке и их переводы на Русский язык
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
Amendments that enter into effect only as between certain parties to a treaty.
Parties to a treaty shared a common interest in ensuring that common norms were not diluted.
Its role should thus be limited to transmitting reservations to the States parties to a treaty.
Parties to a treaty shared a common interest in ensuring that common norms were not diluted.
The view is still widely held that all parties to a treaty should contribute to the subsequent practice in question.
Люди также переводят
It was also pointed out that it was difficult to determine which States ororganizations had the intention of becoming parties to a treaty.
Some delegations stated that all States becoming parties to a treaty should commit themselves to its object and purpose.
Different considerations appeared to the Commission to apply to the case of an outbreak of hostilities between parties to a treaty.
The parties to a treaty normally wish to preserve their agreement, albeit in a manner which conforms to presentday exigencies.
It should be made clear that the disputing parties or the parties to a treaty should agree to the application of the rules on transparency.
Furthermore, interpretations could only be regarded as authentic when they reflected the intentions ofall States parties and not one or several parties to a treaty.
Accordingly, States that become parties to a treaty after the adoption of an amendment but before its entry into force are also counted.
Such obligations should be differentiated clearly from acknowledgements of factual orlegal circumstances that the parties to a treaty had made upon concluding it.
Accordingly, only parties to a treaty were entitled to formulate an objection to reservations made to that treaty. .
Other delegations observed that the term"parties" should not be understood as"States parties to a treaty" but rather as"parties to a conflict.
In an ongoing conflict between parties to a treaty, the issue at stake is the level of trust and confidence necessary for the regular execution of the treaty. .
In the UN practice, the Secretary-General, in his function as depository,informs all Parties to a treaty of the errors and the proposal to correct it.
It is presumed that the parties to a treaty, by a subsequent agreement or subsequent practice, intend to interpret the treaty, not to modify it.
The monitoring they carried out in that connection, though,should not exceed the powers the States parties to a treaty recognized them as having or had conferred on them.
Thus, agreements between less than all parties to a treaty regarding the interpretation of a treaty or its application are a form of subsequent practice under article 32.
The Commission has been divided, however, over the question of whether States orinternational organizations that are entitled to become parties to a treaty may also formulate objections.
The legal effect of the outbreak of hostilities between parties to a treaty is still uncertain, and the only comprehensive treatment of the subject is now out of date.
States parties to a treaty could be directly affected by a reservation formulated by another State Party, but non-party States were not so affected.
On the other hand, encouraging a reservations dialogue between the States parties to a treaty, which was already known to State practice, would be of great benefit.
In some cases, States parties to a treaty have objected to reservations and challenged their compatibility with its object and purpose under the pretext that they were contrary to well-established customary norms.
However, legally, such a transposition is not inevitable: all the parties to a treaty always have the right to modify it by agreement without any time limit.
For example, some parties to a treaty may, unlike others, consider that the substantive provisions of the treaty are indissociable from the clauses relating to implementation mechanisms and that a reservation to such clauses would remove the raison d'être of the treaty. .
Internal conflicts did not directly affect the treaty relationships between States parties to a treaty, and should be dealt with in the framework of the Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties. .
Under the Vienna Convention only parties to a treaty are entitled to invoke inconsistency of the treaty with jus cogens, the implication apparently being that the parties might have the choice of electing in favour of the treaty and against the norm.
Under the current draft article 3, the"actors" in the situations in question are:(i)States parties to a treaty;(ii) a State party or States parties to an armed conflict; and(iii)"third States.