Примери за използване на Commission considered на Английски и техните преводи на Български
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
-
Medicine
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Computer
The Commission considered and issued decisions on many energy mergers.
In our sample of 54 targets, the Commission considered 33 of them to have been achieved.
The Commission considered that the NCTS was comparable in scale to the SIS II project27.
Based on all these considerations, the Commission considered that that company should not be part of a sample.
The Commission considered the information received from European Investment Bank(EIB).
Хората също превеждат
III Based on an appropriate risk analysis andneeds assessment, the Commission considered BS to be the right choice of aid delivery instrument.
The commission considered 15,000 comments, largely from the Street.
For this purpose, andpursuant to Article 21 of the basic Regulation, the Commission considered the likely impact of measures for all parties concerned.
The Commission considered that the immigration rules fell outside the aforementioned principle.
Therefore, in consideration of the regulatory requirements in effect, the Commission considered the residual error rate to be accurate and accepted unconditionally the winding-up declaration.
The Commission considered relevant risks at the time of setting up the IQR.
The Irish authority rejected the complaint, on the ground, in particular, that in a 2002 decision the Commission considered that, under the Safe Harbour scheme, the United States ensures an adequate level of protection of the personal data transferred.
The commission considered the ppp to be Ňan essential factor for the success of the galileo programmeÓ.
As the cooperating producer in the USA did not sell cells on the domestic market during the RIP and, unlike the USA,the market in Taiwan is not shielded by trade defence measures, the Commission considered Taiwan as a more appropriate market economy third country.
On this basis, the Commission considered the action plan to have been successfully implemented.
The General Court misinterpreted the first condition of Article 1(d) and distorted recitals(94) to(110)of the contested decision by concluding that the Commission considered only the legislative acts listed in recital(99) as constituting the basis of the“excess profit” scheme.
The Commission considered the comments made by the interested parties and took them into account, where appropriate.
The Irish authority rejected the complaint, on the ground, in particular,that in a decision of 26 July 2000(2) the Commission considered that, under the“safe harbour” scheme(3), the United States ensures an adequate level of protection of the personal data transferred(the“Safe Harbour Decision”).
The Commission considered that this level of market power would have pushedup prices in a market where they were already high.
In the present case, the contested letter, which was addressed solely to[Athinaïki Techniki], informed it, pursuant to Article 20 of Regulation No 659/1999, that,on the basis of the information in its possession, the Commission considered that there were insufficient grounds for taking a view on the case which was submitted to it in the complaint.
In certain cases, where the Commission considered that the required conditions were not met, it made financial corrections.
In the present case, the letter[in dispute], which was addressed solely to[Athinaïki Techniki], informed it, pursuant to Article 20 of Regulation No 659/1999, that,on the basis of the information in its possession, the Commission considered that there were insufficient grounds for taking a view on the case which was submitted to it in the complaint.
The Commission considered for award only the projects that were confirmed to be supported by the Member States.
The entrance exams VGIK Yakovleva Commission considered unsuitable for filming because of its appearance.
The Commission considered the correction of 15% as reasonable as it represented an adequate estimate based on a thorough analysis of the import market.
In the second place, the Commission considered that there was no overriding public interest in disclosure of the documents at issue.
The Commission considered in its decision that the Italian measure at issue was indirectly discriminatory and disproportionate.
Prior to this date the Commission considered the project still to be in a research phase and all costs incurred were expenses.
The Commission considered the case and prepare a proposal to the Minister of Agriculture and Food to promote regional wine.
At the end of the second six-month period, the Commission considered, that the progress made by France to improve the system of controls, prosecutions and penalties could be considered to be generally satisfactory and of such nature that imposing a second fine would be disproportionate.