Examples of using Revised rules in English and their translations into Arabic
{-}
-
Colloquial
-
Political
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Computer
The revised Rules introduce important improvements, which we support.
This document coversdraft articles 1 to 19 of the draft revised Rules.
The revised rules of procedure are contained in document CLCS/40/Rev.1.
The Committee is invited to adopt the revised rules of procedure as a basis for its work.
The Working Group agreed that itmight be useful to address that issue in the revised Rules.
People also translate
We consider that the revised Rules still maintain the original structure of the text, its spirit and its drafting style.
After further deliberation, the Commission had adopted the revised Rules, which had entered into force on 15 August 2010.
However, the revised Rules should not be formulated in such a way that the universal appeal of the Arbitration Rules was affected.
These are the guidelines that added a rule on the use of bibliographies and revised rules of AGLC1 to make them clearer.
There was an expectation that the revised Rules would be available to users of commercial arbitration as soon as feasible.
The Working Group took note of that point and confirmed that it would consider again draftarticle 21 in the context of its second reading of the revised Rules.
In line with this decision, these revised rules are to have entered into effect as of 1 January 1996.
Articles 41.3, 41.4: The addition of greater control over the determination of arbitrators 'fees and expenses is one of the key improvements of the revised rules.
The Preparatory Session adopted the said revised rules for its work and recommended them for adoption by the Ministerial Meeting.
On 25 July 1996, the Council adopted byconsensus resolution 1996/31, which contains revised rules on consultative relations with NGOs.
The amendments contained in the draft revised Rules promote greater predictability and efficiency in arbitral proceedings.
The Working Group noted that the representative of the Permanent Court of Arbitration confirmed the agreement of itsSecretary-General to perform the functions provided for in the draft revised Rules.
He noted that the revised rules were adapted to make them suitable for all or any purposes for which a Meeting of States Parties may be convened.
On 25 July 1996,the Council adopted by consensus resolution 1996/31 which contains revised rules on consultative relations with non-governmental organizations.
According to the revised rules issued in the year 2013 by the ADCCAC, the language of arbitration should be Arabic unless the parties have agreed otherwise.
The Commission also agreed that the recommendations on the revised Rules should follow the same pattern as the Recommendations adopted in 1982.
The revised rules were considered and it was noted that some rules, particularly the rule relating to decisions having financial implications, were still to be developed.
The Working Group commenced its third reading of the draft revised Rules on the basis of document A/CN.9/WG. II/WP.157 and its addenda 1 and 2.
All States parties to the Covenant have been informed of the amendments to the rules of procedure;the Committee has applied the revised rules since the end of the seventy-first session.
The new introductory note to the revised rules(SPLOS/2/Rev.2) refers to the Agreement relating to the Implementation of part XI of the Convention.
The Commission mayalso wish to further consider whether the recommendations on the revised Rules should follow the same pattern as the Recommendations adopted in 1982.
In that context, it was stated that the revised Rules should not apply to treaties entered into prior to adoption of the revised Rules. .
The United Nations Office at Geneva agreed with this recommendation andon 6 July 2006 issued revised rules for the Committee on Contracts on the basis of the revised 2006 Procurement Manual.
This document covers draft articles 20 to 43 of the revised Rules as well as the annex to the draft Rules containing the model arbitration clause and the model statements of independence.
Yet another proposal wasmade to retain variant 3 with a clarification that the revised Rules did not apply to agreements concluded before the revision of the Rules was adopted.