Examples of using Contested decision in English and their translations into Croatian
{-}
-
Colloquial
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Computer
Annul the contested decision.
II- Background to the dispute and the contested decision.
Accordingly, the contested decision must be found to apply for a limited period.
On 18 November 2009, the Commission adopted the contested decision.
The Council adopted the contested decision on that basis, only the United Kingdom and Ireland voting against the decision. .
The Court of Justice has jurisdiction to annul or to alter the contested decision.
Thus, the contested decision introduces a derogation from the provisions of that regulation to a degree that is unacceptable in the context of a non-legislative act.
Annul the second contested decision;
The General Court shall have jurisdiction to annul or to alter the contested decision.
The contested decision also imposes obligations on those two Member States, the aim of which is to enhance the efficiency of their respective asylum systems.
The same applies to the reference, in the contested decision, to Article 136(1) TFEU.
Paragraph 3 is replaced by the following:"'3. The General Court shall have jurisdiction to annul or to alter the contested decision.';
Specifically, the interpretation which I advocate means that the contested decision does not have the status of a legislative act.
IFPEN adds that, in the contested decision, the Commission failed to specify the reasons why it is plausible to presume the existence of an advantage in favour of IFPEN.
Inasmuch as the ECB deprived the applicant of its right to an effective remedy, the contested Decision should be annulled.
Furthermore, the contested decision itself provides, in Article 10, that financial support is to be provided for each person relocated in accordance with that decision. .
That requirement thus governs the‘close administrative cooperation between Member States'(87)whereby the contested decision must be implemented.
In fact, the contested decision provides, in Article 8(1), that‘[the Italian Republic and the Hellenic Republic] shall, bearing in mind the obligations set out in Article 8(1) of Decision….
According to the Court,‘the… absolute impossibility[of recovering unlawful aid] cannot invalidate the contested decision where it emerges only at the stage of implementation….
The Slovak Republic claims that the contested decision provides that the power to decide on such suspension is vested in the Council, whereas the Commission had proposed that that power be entrusted to it.
The Commission submits in particular that the Republic of Austria merely refers to the contested decision, and not to the decision to initiate the formal investigation procedure.
Appeals shall be filed with the Constitutional Court of the Republic of Croatia through the State Electoral Commission within 48 hours of the expiration of the day on which the contested decision was received.
As the Italian Republic andGrand Duchy of Luxembourg submit, in essence, the contested decision addresses a new emergency situation that arose in July and August 2015.
In that regard, it should be noted, first, that,whilst it is true that Decision 2015/1523 was adopted on 14 September 2015-- in other words eight days before the contested decision-- there is a connection between those measures.
Suffice it to note in that regard that it is evident from recital 49 of the contested decision that that guarantee is not unlimited, but covers the timely payment of principal and interest of qualifying debt.
In inter partes proceedings,the defendant may, in his response, seek a decision annulling or altering the contested decision on a point not raised in the appeal.
The Republic of Austria submits that it is apparent from recital 549 of the contested decision that the system of contracts for difference was discriminatory, since it was not open to electricity generators located outside the United Kingdom.
First, the General Court was wrong to conclude that the Commission lacked the competence to adopt the contested decision and that EU law was inapplicable to the compensation awarded.
As the Council points out,after the final date of application of the contested decision, on 26 September 2017, the effects of the derogations will automatically expire and the general rules will begin to apply again, without the need for any intervention whatsoever on the part of the EU legislature.