Examples of using Parallel proceedings in English and their translations into Hungarian
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
-
Medicine
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Financial
-
Programming
-
Official/political
-
Computer
When parallel proceedings have already been opened in a third country.
This amendment aims at avoiding parallel proceedings in- and outside the EU.
To prevent parallel proceedings and of the application of different substantive laws to the property of a married or unmarried couple.
Tomorrow's new rules end such abusive tactics byensuring the chosen court receives priority in case of parallel proceedings.
A drawback of this solution is that parallel proceedings leading to irreconcilable judgments are possible.
Second, the Commission should have come to an agreement with the BNetzA inorder to secure information and avoid parallel proceedings.
To achieve a situation where parallel proceedings do not occur and where different substantive laws are not applied to the same international succession.
The application of a single law by asingle authority to an international succession avoids parallel proceedings, with possibly conflicting judicial decisions.
Where such parallel proceedings in another Member State concern the same measure, decision or practice, the court may suspend the proceedings. .
The application of a single law by asingle authority to an international succession avoids parallel proceedings, with possibly conflicting judicial decisions.
This may prevent parallel proceedings between courts and arbitral tribunals where the agreement is held invalid in one Member State and valid in another.
I agree with the amendments introduced by this resolution,which will make it possible to prevent unnecessary parallel proceedings and administrative costs in this area.
The EESC stresses the importance of preventing parallel proceedings and the application of different substantive laws to the property of married or registered couples.
The EESC considers that when reforming Regulation 44/2001, the appropriate measures should be adopted to ensure thatjudgments can move freely within Europe and to prevent parallel proceedings.
This Regulation should thereforecontain special rules aimed at avoiding parallel proceedings and abusive litigation tactics in those circumstances.
If parallel proceedings exist, the relevant authorities must enter into direct consultation in order to find a solution aimed at avoiding the negative consequences arising from these proceedings. .
By setting out objectivecriteria for determining the court having jurisdiction, parallel proceedings and appeals precipitated by the most active party can be avoided.
This could be the case, for instance, when parties have concluded an exclusive choice of court agreement in favour of the courts of third States, when the dispute otherwise falls under the exclusive jurisdiction of third State courts,or when parallel proceedings have already been brought in a third State5.
Where a competent court of a MemberState has reasonable grounds to believe that parallel proceedings are being conducted in another Member State, it shall contact the competent court in the other Member State to confirm the existence of such parallel proceedings.
The Court will be able to deliver judgments on the validity and the infringement of European and unifiedpatents for all the Contracting States, avoiding parallel proceedings and divergent outcomes.
If the competent authority of an EUcountry has reasonable grounds to believe that parallel proceedings are being conducted in another EU country, it must seek confirmation of the existence of such parallel proceedings from the competent authority of that country.
It is estimated that these mechanisms have allowed for the reduction of the number ofproceedings to around 150 from almost a thousand potential parallel proceedings in the period between 2004 and 2008.
Where a competent court of a MemberState has reasonable grounds to believe that parallel proceedings are being conducted in another Member State, it shall contact the competent court in the other Member State to confirm the existence of such parallel proceedings. .
The Commission will support the Member States in their enforcement efforts against infringements with an important EU-level dimension,thereby avoiding the duplication involved in carrying out parallel proceedings to address the same infringements.
It is settled case-law that Articles 21 and 22 of the Convention seek, in the interests of sound administrationof justice in the Community, to avoid parallel proceedings before courts of different Contracting States and the conflicting decisions which might result, so as to avoid as far as possible cases in which a decision given in one Contracting State is liable not to be recognised in another Contracting State.
In fact, available information clearly supports the view that these mechanisms have allowed the appropriate authority tohandle cases while also avoiding unnecessary parallel proceedings and inconsistent enforcement efforts.
As the Court has previously held, in the interests of the sound administration of justice within the European Union,those rules are intended to prevent parallel proceedings before the courts of different Member States and to avoid conflicts between decisions which might result therefrom.
This should not prevent, however, addressing certain specific points relating to arbitration in the Regulation, not for the sake of regulating arbitration, but in the first place to ensure the smooth circulation of judgments in Europe andprevent parallel proceedings.
If it were assumed that the proceedings for compensation brought by the English holiday-maker who suffered an accident similar to that suffered by Mr Owusu were still pending andcould be regarded as related to the main proceedings in this case, those parallel proceedings were commenced in Jamaica, that is to say before the courts of a non-Contracting State, so that Article 22 does not in principle fall to be applied.
It seems to me that discretion is, as a result, left to that court, subject nevertheless to the requirement that it respects in any event the purpose of Article 28 of that regulation, which is, in the interests of the proper administration of justice within theUnion, to prevent parallel proceedings before the courts of different Member States and to avoid conflicts between decisions which might result therefrom.