Примеры использования Significant harm на Английском языке и их переводы на Русский язык
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
Significant harm" same threshold as.
Obligation not to cause significant harm.
Whether it applied to significant harm or simply harm was of secondary importance.
Article 7 Obligation not to cause significant harm.
Threshold of damage: significant harm as a necessary criterion.
Люди также переводят
Prevents only the failures that can cause significant harm.
These programs can do significant harm to your computer.
The other pole is where there is a high probability of causing other significant harm.
Obligation not to cause significant harm GREECE.
Hazardous activity" means an activity which involves a risk of causing significant harm;
The experiments have caused significant harm to the ecosystem of the Semipalatinsk region.
Of course, there will be no significant harm from such"treatment", but no benefit as well not mentioning wasted money.
The galls apparently do not cause significant harm to the tree.
The problem was that"significant harm" was a term of art in other legal contexts, where it might have a different meaning.
Draft article 6-- Obligation not to cause significant harm to other aquifer States.
Significant harm" same threshold as in the draft articles on prevention of transboundary harm paragraph 174, subparagraph(c)(4) above.
Disclosure of information may cause significant harm to such lawful interest, and if.
The"significant harm" definition should be retained, particularly since it was widely reflected in State practice and in various treaties.
This set will be able to get rid of toxins,which cause significant harm to human health.
The Working Group also defined significant harm as one that is not de minimus or that is not negligible.
Significant harm is explained as something more than measurable, but need not be at the level of serious or substantial harm. .
Is it that such destruction causes significant harm to another aquifer system State?
Under article 7, watercourse States were bound to utilize an international watercourse in such a way as not to cause significant harm to other watercourse States.
Support was expressed for retaining"significant harm" as the triggering threshold for allocation of loss.
The obligations of prevention,reduction and control all apply to pollution"that may cause significant harm to other aquifer States.
The draft referred to the concept of“significant harm”, which was often used to establish a threshold beyond which damage was deemed to have occurred.
In its view, equitable andreasonable utilization of an international watercourse by definition ruled out significant harm to another watercourse State.
Even management of non-hazardous wastes can cause significant harm to human health and the environment if not undertaken in an environmentally sound manner.
Although the dose limits for exposure had been the subject of public concern,they were well below those shown to cause significant harm to health.