Examples of using Functionally equivalent in English and their translations into Arabic
{-}
-
Colloquial
-
Political
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Computer
I suppose at the end of the day, they're all functionally equivalent.
With respect to title transactions that were functionally equivalent to secured transactions, the view was expressed that they should not be subject to registration.
For the purposes of the Convention, the word" similar" connotes" functionally equivalent".
Second, the treaties require States to" ensure"(or some functionally equivalent verb) the enjoyment or realization of those rights by rights holders.
For the purposes of the Model Law,the word" similar" connotes" functionally equivalent".
Likewise, any transaction that produces results which are functionally equivalent(retention-of-title sale or a financial lease) is considered as an acquisition financing transaction.
Windows 10 Pro builds on the Home edition andadds features essential for businesses, and functionally equivalent to Windows 8.1 Pro.
In order to achieve the desired functionally equivalent results, therefore, these States will have to provide a mix of mandatory and non-mandatory rules vesting each of these prerogatives and these obligations in the buyer and not in the seller or lessor.
It was agreed that the Guide to Enactment would clarify that theword" similar" in that context would connote" functionally equivalent".
The MLETR applies to electronic transferable records that are functionally equivalent to transferable documents or instruments.
It should make it clear that an enhanced electronic signature could be regarded as one that satisfied the requirements established by the Model Law for reliability and appropriateness,and could thus be regarded as functionally equivalent to a handwritten signature.
It emphasizes the consequences of these principles,meaning if various methods can produce functionally equivalent results, the same rules of law should apply to all these methods.
However, to ensure a proper coordination among these various transactions and to ensure as far as possible their equal treatment, these States subject all these transactions, however denominated,to a framework of rules that produces functionally equivalent outcomes.
To achieve this result, they would have to ensure that the rulesgoverning effectiveness as between the parties would be functionally equivalent, regardless of the form of the acquisition financing transaction(see recommendation 185).
The second main policy choice that confronts Statesconcerns the manner in which they design legislation to achieve functionally equivalent outcomes.
They would then also have to ensure that therules governing effectiveness as between the parties bring about functionally equivalent results regardless of the form of the acquisition financing transaction(see A/CN.9/631, recommendation 184, non-unitary approach).
It was concluded at that time that the law of bills of lading was insufficiently codified in an international instrument tobe able to accommodate an electronic record functionally equivalent to a paper-based bill of lading.
In order toput these principles into operation in a manner that produces outcomes that are functionally equivalent to those achieved under the unitary approach, however, various adjustments to the substance of the law relating to retention-of-title rights and financial lease rights would be required.
As for the substance of the law,similar adjustments would be necessary in order to produce outcomes that are functionally equivalent to those achieved under a unitary approach.
That is,the Guide recommends that States enact regimes that achieve functionally equivalent outcomes, regardless of whether they also decide to adopt the fully integrated approach(see recommendation 174 for the unitary approach and recommendation 185 for the non-unitary approach).
The fundamental principle set out in recommendation 185 was that the rightsexercised by a retention-of-title seller should be functionally equivalent to those of an acquisition financier.
The rules governing different types of acquisition financing rights should bring about economic results that are functionally equivalent to each other and, as more fully provided in recommendations 185-201,these economic results should be functionally equivalent to those brought about by the rules applicable to acquisition security rights.
Should a State adopt the non-unitary approach, however, it will be necessary to adjust the rulesrelating to attachments to achieve a result that is functionally equivalent regardless of the form of the transaction.
To the extent that those traditional concepts were essential for the application of rules on contract formation under domestic and uniform law,the provision of functionally equivalent concepts for an electronic environment was said to be an important objective of the draft convention.
As to recommendation 134(enforcement), the Commission noted that the main difference between the alternatives set out in the recommendation was that the second version of the non-unitary approach resulted inacquisition security rights not being functionally equivalent to non-acquisition security rights.
The Working Group also agreed that text should be added to therecommendations on retention-of-title devices to ensure that they applied to functionally equivalent transactions, such as financial leases and purchase-money transactions.
To the extent that those traditional concepts are essential for the application of rules on contract formation under domestic and uniform law,UNCITRAL considered that it was very important to provide functionally equivalent concepts for an electronic environment(A/CN.9/528, para. 137).
The law should provide that post-default rights relating to an acquisition security right are governed by rules that, subject to recommendation 200bis, subparagraph(b),produce results functionally equivalent to the results produced by the provisions of the law governing post-default rights relating to an acquisition financing right.
That suggestion received support subject to ensuring that language would be added in the recommendations on the non-unitary approach to ensure that therecommendations on retention-of-title devices would apply to functionally equivalent transactions, such as financial leases and purchase-money lending transactions.
The remedies available to a lender in respect of acquisition securityrights in a non-unitary jurisdiction should be functionally equivalent to those available to a retention-of-title seller.