Examples of using Whose decision in English and their translations into Finnish
{-}
-
Colloquial
-
Official
-
Medicine
-
Financial
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Official/political
-
Computer
-
Programming
Whose decision was that?
But we know whose decision it is.
Whose decision was it to enter?- I did.
Leaking the kompromat. Whose decision was that?
And whose decision was that?
Directive 10-289 shall be administered and enforced by the Unification Board, whose decisions will be final.
Well, whose decision is it?
The foundation's highest body is the Board of Trustees, whose decisions are implemented by the Governing Board.
I did.- Whose decision was it to enter?
Whose decision was that? Leaking the kompromat.
The First Brethren Court, whose decision I would have opposed.
Whose decision was it to take Daniel Miller alive?
The First Brethren Court, whose decision I would have opposed.
Whose decision was it to release So are we.
An appeal against the decision may be lodged with the Supervisory Board whose decision may be referred to the In surance Court.
Whose decisions affect the livesof millions of people.
However, this is essentially an intergovernmental organism whose decisions, which affect us all, have to be implemented nationally.
Within 30 days of the TAR's decision, the applicant could lodge an appeal against it before the Council of State whose decision was final.
If the department whose decision is contested considers the appeal to be admissible and well founded, it shall rectify its decision. .
I also hope for a transparent WTO, and a credible andlegitimate organisation, whose decisions could be upheld by its members and civil society.
If the department whose decision is contested does not rectify its decision it is to remit the appeal to a Board of Appeal of the Office, which is to decide on it.
Instead, all Disputes will be resolved before a neutral arbitrator, whose decision will be final except for a limited right to judicial review under the FAA.
Thirdly, the compromise confirms that the option must always be provided to refer a case to a judge, an independent andimpartial court, whose decision must be respected.
On the other hand,a policy that brings about a major shock, but whose decisions have to be quickly reversed because they lack the support of stakeholders, will create doubt and confusion, ultimately depriving the policy of much of its impact and relevance.
The object of the Community patent system is to provide a Community wide patent protection which can be enforced before one single court operating to uniform standards and whose decisions enjoy Community wide effect.
Above all, we appeal to the United States, a country whose decisions have an immense impact on global politics, to support the Italian initiative to establish a universal moratorium on the death penalty which will be approved- with this Parliament's support, I hope- in the United Nations General Assembly.
An appropriate appeal mechanism should be set up so that decisions of the Authority can be subject to appeal to a specialised Board of Appeal, whose decisions, in turn, should be open to action before the Court of Justice.
Although there may have been some doctrinal debate as to whether State liability could be established as a consequence of decisions of national courts not necessarily ruling at last instance,(15)I think it is apparent from now settled case-law of the Court that the establishment of that liability is clearly limited to omissions of national courts whose decisions are not open to ordinary appeal.
It is completely unacceptable that, in matters which are ofkey importance to them, the social partners might be obliged to resort to the European Court of Justice, whose decisions are sometimes a source of either incomprehension or controversy.