Examples of using Differences in interpretation in English and their translations into Slovenian
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
-
Medicine
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Financial
-
Computer
-
Official/political
-
Programming
Differences in interpretation among Member States distort the basis 23.
There is therefore a need to eliminate differences in interpretation by simplifying the regulatory environment.
Differences in interpretation of these terms made it difficult to assess the implementation of the Recommendation in some Member States.
Removing the concept of dietetic food would prevent differences in interpretation, as all foods will be considered in the same way by general legislation.
This could arise due to different degrees of risk assessment beingcarried out in Member States combined with potential differences in interpretation of such assessments.
The Court of Justice of the European Union(hereinafter“the Court”) has continued to specify the arrangements ofDirective 85/374/EEC thus contributing to removing the differences in interpretation.
The EESC supports the aim offostering the effectiveness of the type-approval framework by reducing the differences in interpretation and strictness in application across Member States and to make the whole legal system more robust.
Where there are any differences in interpretation or implementation, the Commission should consult the Member States in question and clarify the rules.
However, the Commission recognises that development of free competition in the rail sector is also hindered in part by the ambiguity of the body of rail legislation and the weakness of certain provisions that require clarifications andadjustments to reduce differences in interpretation between the Member States.
Notified bodies, in relation to their competence for the tasks designated to them, differences in interpretation between them, and a lack of transparency in their performance and in control over their activities;
To address the differences in interpretation and implementation of the main provisions of the Directive, the Commission is developing some Guidelines on the interpretation of the PRF Directive.
Notified Bodies- in relation to their competence for the tasks for which they are designated, differences in interpretation between Notified Bodies and lack of transparency in the performance, and control, of their activities.
The differences in interpretations of the directive by Member States give patientsin different parts of Europe different access to high quality information on the relevant drugs.
Given the complex nature of the rules, the differences in interpretation and implementation between Member States, and the considerable changes in the road transport sector over the subsequent 15 years, the Commission adopted a proposal for a new Regulation to simplify, clarify and update the rules.
Differences in interpretation due to lack of a common guidance for cosmetics claims in the EU are not beneficial to consumers either, because they cannot be sure what is the adequate meaning of the given claim when they are buying the same product in different Member States which might lead to confusion among them.
Considers that differences in interpretation and non-compliance with the values referred to in Article 2 of the TEU weaken the cohesion of the European project, the rights of all Europeans and the mutual trust needed among the Member States;
Differences in interpretation due to lack of common criteria and a practical guidance for product claims make it necessary for the cosmetics companies operating in the internal market to check and review each and every claim and advertisement by themselves in every Member State in order to make sure that they are following the law in the given country.
This will therefore resolve problems linked to differences in interpretation of the scope of the regulation and the problems caused by this, such as: distortion of competition and the different levels of protection against the risks to public and animal health; ABP classification based to a larger extent on risks; clarification of derogations(e.g. impact of ABPs on research, disease outbreaks, natural disasters); reduction in the administrative burden by eliminating the duplication of permits for certain types of economic units.
That is a staggeringly big difference in interpretation.
So, here's the difference in interpretation.
This difference in interpretation is particularly relevant for the waste sector, where many non-IPPC installations are subject to inspection requirements.
If you listen to what Ms McGuinness and Mr Graefe zu Baringdorf said this morning,it shows the difference in interpretation in different Member States.
This difference in interpretation has an effect on the implementation of the Recommendation and in particular on the planning of inspections, as all activities concerned should be taken into account in the inspection plans.
The difference in interpretation revealed in the two essays is so extraordinary that I think it is important to point out at least some of the dilemmas that emerge from that difference in order for the reader to understand my thinking.