Примеры использования Aid levels на Английском языке и их переводы на Русский язык
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
But increasing aid levels will not be enough; we must become more effective.
Understandably, many nations see the decline in recent years of official aid levels as the writing on the wall.
Therefore, despite a marked increase in aid levels, socioeconomic indicators have continued to show significant decline.
This means that the portion of the resource gap that is to be financed externally represents an increase over current aid levels.
Foreign investment is increasing, and aid levels have declined although marginally, showing continued donor support.
Fourthly, low-income countries need more financial and technical assistance, andwe welcome the various pledges to raise aid levels.
Though this implies doubling current aid levels, it represents around one fifth of 1 per cent of income in donor countries.
In the case of my own country, for example, official development assistance from traditional and regional donors has declined andconditions are being imposed on the reduced aid levels.
Consensus runs deep that current aid levels will not suffice to finance the Millennium Development Goals MDGs.
Major aid-giving Governments promised in 2002 at the International Conference on Financing for Development to raise substantially their aid levels, especially for sub-Saharan Africa.
In fact, when they started out reforms, their aid levels vis-à-vis other African countries were lower, and financial support took off only as policies developed.
On the other hand, non-post-conflict countries, which, nevertheless, are facing severe internal pressures,receive, on average, less than one third of other countries' per capita aid levels.
An OECD/DAC annual survey of donor spending plans indicated that aid levels could increase again in 2014 and stabilize thereafter.36.
On top of this, foreign aid levels fell dramatically after the events of October 1993: preliminary figures for 1995 suggest that the level of overall assistance was only one third of that for 1992.
However, to get the economies of African countries charted towards more positive growth rates, aid levels should be made more generous, not reduced, for a period of time.
In the light of the inadequate aid levels to Africa relative to what is required to close the huge financing gap, the implementation of the aid effectiveness agenda assumes greater importance.
The goal of strengthening health systems is complicated by many problems, including foreign aid levels and the migration of health workers from low-income countries.
Acknowledging the likelihood that aid levels will remain below the target of 0.7 per cent of gross national income(GNI) in the near future, innovative sources of financing, including global taxes and funds.
The outlook for Aid for Trade, however, is bound to be affected by the continuing tight government budgets in OECD countries,which in turn will put pressure on aid levels in the coming years.
Particularly for these countries, it is a matter of urgency that aid levels are maintained, as they will need to expand their capacity to raise domestic revenues-- e.g. expand their tax base.
While some LDCs received donor support at significant levels following the adoption of economic reform programmes and democratization,other countries with similar records saw little rise in aid levels.
Fourthly, the international community should increase aid levels to 0.7 per cent of gross domestic product and increase the proportion of aid that is targeted to the poorest countries.
There is a broad consensus within the international community that,given the problems of deepening poverty and the need for accelerated development in Africa, aid levels to the region, especially to sub-Saharan Africa, should be significantly increased.
Moreover, while a certain focus has been made on reaching specific aid levels by 2006, the predictability of subsequent aid flows is also required, including flows up to the target year of 2015 and beyond.
In marked contrast to the first decade of the millennium, ODA has been falling in real terms for two consecutive years andbudgetary pressures in many donor countries indicate that aid levels may stagnate in the medium term.
The Commission for Africa in its recent report urges the doubling of aid levels to sub-Saharan Africa over the forthcoming three to five years, bringing the new aid level to $50 billion by 2010.
Maldives: Graduation would not be envisaged until effective structural benefits have generated structural progress under the national population relocation strategy(sea-level rise), anduntil answers have been brought to the question of"smooth transition" regarding the EU market and future aid levels.
It is important to maintain aid levels during this transitional period because this will contribute to stabilizing the economic conditions that would permit the emergence of political and social conditions propitious to free institutions.
At the First United Nations Conference on the Least Developed Countries, held in Paris in 1990, when the total ODA provided by the DAC member countries to the least developed countries was 0.09 per cent of their combined GNP,it was agreed that donor countries would double previous aid levels, or attain a level of 0.15 per cent of national income for this group.
In real terms, water and sanitation aid levels in 2005 were lower than in 1997, a marked contrast to education, whose aid commitments doubled over the same period, and a contrast to aid commitments in health as well.