Примеры использования Had ratified protocol на Английском языке и их переводы на Русский язык
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
Romania had ratified Protocol V nearly one year earlier, and the Protocol had entered into force for the country on 29 July 2008.
With respect to the European Convention on Human Rights,by the beginning of 1994 some 20 countries had ratified Protocol No. 6, which provides for the abolition of the death penalty in peacetime.
In 2000 it had ratified Protocol No. 6 to the European Convention, abolishing the death penalty for peacetime offences.
He noted that only 48 High Contracting Parties to the Convention had done so, and that, of the 110 High Contracting Parties,only 61 had ratified Protocol V. He urged other States to take that step as soon as possible.
His Government had ratified Protocols I, II, III and IV of the Convention, and was downsizing its armed forces and military facilities.
Люди также переводят
Those two countries had also ratified Protocols I, III andIV. Georgia had recently become the ninety-third Party to amended Protocol II. In 2009, the United States had ratified Protocol III on Prohibitions or Restrictions on the Use of Incendiary Weapons, bringing the total number of Parties to 104.
His Government had ratified protocols I and II to the African Nuclear-Weapon-Free Zone Treaty and supported the Treaty on a Nuclear-Weapon-Free Zone in Central Asia, whose legal status must be finalized in 2013.
Mr. Wang Qun(Observer for China)said that his country had ratified Protocol V in April 2010; the Protocol would enter into force for China in December.
Belgium had ratified Protocol No. 13 to the European Convention on Human Rights concerning the abolition of the death penalty in all circumstances on 23 June 2003 and the Federal Parliament had incorporated that principle in Title II of the Constitution on 25 March 2004.
Mr. Guerreiro(Brazil) said that while it was encouraging that new States had ratified Protocol V in the course of the past year, much remained to be done to achieve the universality of the instrument.
In 2009, Peru had ratified Protocol V, on Explosive Remnants of War, to the Convention on Certain Conventional Weapons, thus joining the efforts of the international community to promote post-conflict international humanitarian action that would reduce risks and contribute to detente, arms limitation and confidence-building among States.
Mr. Henczel(Observer for Poland)said that on 1 July 2011, the President of the Republic of Poland had ratified Protocol V on explosive remnants of war and that Poland had submitted its instrument of ratification to the Secretary-General of the United Nations on 26 September 2011.
Mr. Sobczak(Poland) said that in 2000 Poland had ratified Protocol No. 6 to the European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms concerning abolition of the death penalty and that the Penal Code of 2007 had abolished capital punishment, thereby giving effect to the objective of the second Optional Protocol to the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, aiming at the abolition of the death penalty.
Article 27 of the Constitution guaranteed the right to life.On 4 April 2000, Ukraine had ratified Protocol No. 6 to the European Convention on Human Rights concerning the abolition of the death penalty and the new Penal Code contained no offence punishable by the death penalty.
He was particularly pleased that the Government had ratified Protocol No. 6 to the European Convention on Human Rights concerning the abolition of the death penalty, and urged the Government to ratify the Second Optional Protocol to the Covenant.
Mr. TURCOTTE(Canada) congratulated the States parties that had ratified Protocol V, and called on them to ensure that they had the means, mechanisms and processes in place to meet their obligations.
Mr. MacBride(Observer for Canada)said that Canada had ratified Protocol V in May 2009 and would become a High Contracting Party on 19 November 2009; it had thus ratified all the Protocols to the Convention and the amendments thereto.
Ms. CARAYANIDES(Australia) said that Australia had ratified Protocol I and Protocol II on 21 June 1991, and that on 23 September 1992 it had made a declaration pursuant to article 90 of Protocol I recognizing the competence of the International Fact-Finding Commission.
Mr. Simon-Michel(France) said that, since France had ratified Protocol V, the French Armed Forces had adopted operating procedures that would allow for information on used or abandoned explosive ordnance to be recorded in order to facilitate destruction or deactivation at the end of an armed conflict.
Ms. Bezhanishvili(Observer for Georgia) said that,on 21 October 2008, by decision of its parliament, Georgia had ratified Protocol V. Georgia hoped that its cooperation with all High Contracting Parties to the Protocol would be fruitful and would contribute to reducing the humanitarian problems posed by explosive remnants of war produced by armed conflicts.
The United States has ratified Protocol I. Canada and Chile have signed Protocol II.
China has ratified Protocols I and II. France has ratified Protocols I, II and III.
Latvia has ratified Protocol No. 6 to the European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms.
Having ratified Protocol IV, Ukraine has become a State Party to all the protocols annexed to the above Convention.
In addition, 1 State has signed and ratified Protocol I to the Convention while 3 States have signed, and 2 States have ratified, Protocol II to the Convention.
Austria has ratified Protocol No. 4 to the European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, which in article 2, paragraph 1 guarantees the right to liberty of movement to everyone lawfully within the territory of Austria.
To date, China has ratified Protocol II to the Treaty for the Prohibition of Nuclear Weapons in Latin America and the Caribbean, Protocol II and III to the South Pacific Nuclear Free Zone Treaty, Protocol I and II to the African Nuclear-Weapon-Free Zone Treaty.
To urge the States possessing nuclear weapons which, having ratified Protocols I and II of the Treaty of Tlatelolco, have done so with unilateral interpretations that affect the status of denuclearization established by the Treaty, to modify or withdraw said unilateral interpretations.
All the independent countries of the South Pacific are now covered by the Treaty, and four of the nuclear-weapon States(the United Kingdom, China, France andthe Russian Federation) have ratified protocols giving security assurances to the region.
All the independent countries of the South Pacific are now covered by the Treaty, and four of the nuclear-weapon States(the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, China, France andthe Russian Federation) have ratified protocols giving security assurances to the region.