Примери за използване на Court considers на Английски и техните преводи на Български
{-}
-
Colloquial
-
Official
-
Medicine
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Computer
The Court considers each separately.
Take any other measures that the Court considers appropriate.
The court considers that a conciliation may be achieved.
(iii) any other circumstances the court considers appropriate, and.
The Court considers that this practice is not appropriate.
Хората също превеждат
(b) provide for any other matters that the court considers appropriate.
The Court considers that that is the case here.
(b) providing for such other matters as the court considers appropriate.
But what the Court considers appropriate, is acceptable to us.
(iii) providing for any other matters that the court considers appropriate; and.
The Court considers it expedient to examine those arguments together.
The Commission underlines that the Court considers all errors equal to or above 2%‘serious'.
The Court considers that that assessment must be accepted.
When evaluating what would best for your child, the court considers a number of factors, such as.
The Court considers that cross compliance is a vital element of the CAP.
(e)encouraging the parties to use an alternative dispute resolution procedure if the court considers that appropriate and facilitating the use of such procedure.”.
The Court considers the information requirements to be thorough.
Accordingly, I will only briefly examine that ground of appealfor reasons of completeness, or in the event that the Court considers the third ground of appeal to be inadmissible or unfounded.
The Court considers that the Commission's procedures have since improved.
Set aside paragraph 3 of the operative part of the order under appeal to the extent that the Court considers that it requires the Council of the European Union to pay only the costs incurred by the appellant but not the costs incurred by the deceased;
The Court considers this observation duly addressed by DG ELARG.
In the present case, where the deceased was a vulnerable individual who lost his life in a horrendous manner due to a series of failures by public bodies andservants who bore a responsibility to safeguard his welfare, the Court considers that the public interest attaching to the issues thrown up by the case was such as to call for the widest exposure possible.
The Court considers that these figures need to be put into context.
In case of unlawful omission the court considers whether or not there is an obligation to act.
The Court considers that the amount claimed under(a) must be reimbursed in part;
In case of an unlawful act the court considers whether or not the act in question is law-founded.
That court considers that the general prohibition provided for in that clause is not necessary, since there are other equally appropriate means that are less restrictive of competition, such as the application of specific quality criteria for the third-party platforms.
Other such factors the court considers necessary for just and equitable distribution of property.
The Court considers therefore that those measures are not compatible with the principle of proportionality.
For these various reasons, the Court considers that in the circumstances deprivation of liberty occurred.