Examples of using Programme's implementation in English and their translations into German
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Medicine
-
Financial
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Political
-
Computer
-
Programming
-
Official/political
-
Political
The programme's implementation is progressing according toplan.
Was only the second year of the programme's implementation.
The programme's implementation is progressing according to plan.
Some€ 6.7 million will be used to support the programme's implementation.
However, the programme's implementation lacks clear lines of responsibilities and an efficient coordination mechanism.
The Delegations are associated during all steps of the programme's implementation.
Review period This report covers the programme's implementation from 1 January 1998 to 31 December 2002.
The private sector andcivil society will be closely involved in the programme's implementation.
The law outlining the Medium-Term Fiscal Strategy programme's implementation was passed by a plenary session of Parliament on June 29.
In that way, the states will become actively involved in the programme's implementation.
The Committee assisting the Commission in the programme's implementation will operate on two different levels: as an advisory committee and. for the most important questions, as a management committee.
The evaluation puts forward three recommendations to guide andfurther optimise the programme's implementation.
The Committee assisting the Commission in the programme's implementation will operate on two different levels: as an advisory committee and. for the most important questions, as a management committee.
The Council agreed lo earmark ECU 620 million as the amount deemed necessary for the programme's implementation.
The report's firm intention was that the financial framework for the programme's implementation during the 1998-1999 period should be increased from the Council's proposal of ECU 35 million to ECU 80 million.
Like the rapporteur, however, we regret that thereis, as yet, no definitive report that evaluates the programme's implementation.
The financial framework for the five years of the programme's implementation was set at EUR 67.25 million.
Firstly by adopting a single economic policy on economic issues and secondlyby holding member states accountable for their successes and failures in the programme's implementation.
It calls for an appropriate balance to be struck between monitoring the programme's implementation and the need to ensure that its allocations are fully spent, and proposes easier access for prospective proposers.
Apart from the figures for expenditure effected, the Commission is satisfied with the progress of the programme's implementation on the ground.
I also wish to emphasise that the programme's implementation must enable its reach to be extended, to encompass the accession and candidate countries or any other countries that enjoy privileged relations with the Union.
A number of member states called for adjustments to thecommittee procedure in order to strike a balance between the required flexibility in the programme's implementation and the need to ensure the appropriate involvement of member states.
The Ministers debated the EU's main priorities for the programme's implementation from an environmental perspective, the role of policy coherence and the methods for effectively accounting for the measures taken and the progress made.
Key public actors include national space agencies, national research centres, European organisations such as EUMETSAT, ESO, etc. The private sector willbe a key interlocutor since so much of the Programme's implementation will depend on its efforts.
The Commission will have to ensure,in close cooperation with the Member States, that the programme's implementation is consistent with other relevant Community policies, programmes and actions and that it complements them.
I voted in favour of this report because I believe that anappropriate mid-term review of the Seventh Framework Programme of the European Union for research, technological development and demonstration activities is particularly important for establishing whether the programme's implementation accords with the objectives set.
The sources used are the following: the key data on the programme's implementation, the conclusions of the national evaluation reports on programme implementation, also provided for in the Decision and which the 30 participating countries agreed to submit by 30 September 20034, the available conclusions of the external evaluations initiated by the Commission5 and the data available within the Commission services6.
Moreover, the role of the European Parliament should be increased with regard to information,giving it a right of appeal throughout the programme's implementation period, particularly during the assessment process.
Apart from their role of information and dissemination,these structures can also provide feedback to the European Commission on the programme's implementation and on national programmes, initiatives and policies in the area of active European citizenship.
Pecial attention should be paid to the use of new technologies in theframework of MEDIA Plus, while at the same time ensuring enough flexibility for the programme's implementation; moreover, complementarity with other Community policies and initiatives in this field should be sought;