Examples of using Voting rules in English and their translations into German
{-}
-
Official
-
Financial
-
Colloquial
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Medicine
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Political
-
Computer
-
Programming
-
Official/political
-
Political
Structure and voting rules.
Voting rules in the Council of Ministers.
Procedure, timetable and voting rules Article 272(6) of the EC Treaty.
The voting rules are set out in Article 330 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union.
Procedure, timetable and voting rules Article 272(6) of the EC Treaty.
New voting rules and an automatic correction mechanism will enforce compliance more effectively.
Procedure, timetable and voting rules Article 203(6) of the EEC Treaty.
I am talking here about issues such as suspending voting rights orintroducing new voting rules such as reverse majority.
Article 9- Voting rules of the Management Board.
Decision Costs and Welfare Effects of Democratic Voting Rules- An Experimental Analysis.
The relative voting weight of Member States in the Council is set out in the Treaties andthe Regulation governing the adoption of implementing acts is based on these voting rules.
This is to ensure that the voting rules are respected.
The voting rules permit the formation of'blocking minorities', when at least four States make up a total of 23 votes, preventing the attainment of the qualified majority of 54 votes. .
The main task of these materials-to inform citizens about the date and place of elections, voting rules and the nuances of electoral law.
The voting rules shall include specific provisions on how to avoid any conflict of interests in the Airport Users' Committee resulting from the presence of airport users that provide groundhandling services at the airport concerned.
Euro area members will fully support the Polish Presidency in order toreach agreement with the European Parliament on voting rules in the preventive arm of the Pact.
As regards the voting rules for the setting up of the list of safe third countries of origin, the Council noted a clear preference to establishing it by qualified majority after consultation with the European Parliament.
The Commission, according to the Treaties, may make recommendations to the Council on possible additional negotiating directives onany issue, with the same procedures for adoption, including voting rules, as for this mandate”.
When it comes to the voting rules in the Council, we consider that a balance must be maintained between the interests of the small and large states. This can be achieved by laying down requirements for a certain number of votes in the Council which must, at the same time, represent a simple majority of the total population of the Union.
The proposals involve the creation of a"single supervisory mechanism" for the oversight of credit institutions,conferring supervisory tasks on the European Central Bank and amending the voting rules of the European Banking Authority.
The voting rules within the special body representing the employees for negotiation purposes, in particular when concluding agreements providing for a level of participation lower than the one existing within one or more of the participating companies, should be proportionate to the risk of disappearance or reduction of existing systems and practices of participation.
This would mean that the decisions taken by the European Stability Mechanism in this period would not be legitimised andmonitored by the German Bundestag, regardless of which voting rules are provided for by the Treaty with regard to the decisions to be made in the specific situation.
Due to different voting rules in the Council stemming from variable geometry pursuant to Protocols 19(on the Schengen acquis) and 21(the position of the UK and Ireland in respect of the area of Freedom, Security and Justice) it is not legally possible to draw up one single comprehensive legislative proposal for an Internal Security Fund, despite the coherence of the policy objectives to be addressed.
The most obvious solution is to increase the number of permanent members from five to eight or nine(including Germany, Japan, India and possibly Brazil)and to change the voting rules, so that two or three permanent members--rather than just one--are needed to block an action.
Due to different voting rules in the Council pursuant to Protocols 19(on the Schengen acquis) and 21(the position of the United Kingdom and Ireland in respect of the area of Freedom, Security and Justice) and 22(the position of Denmark, including in relation to Title V, part three of the Treaty) it is not legally possible to draw up one single comprehensive legislative proposal for an Internal Security Fund, despite the coherence of the policy objectives to be addressed.
The legislative, budgetary and political functions of the Parliament have been developed to suchan extent as to change the very nature of the Institution but neither the voting rules(the weighting remains the same) nor the representativeness of the Members in terms of ratio of citizens to Members have changed substantially.
The proposal intends to enable the Council of the European Union, meeting in the composition of the Heads of States or Government and acting unanimously, to amend in the futureby a simplified procedure, rather than convening a full-scale Intergovernmental Conference, the provisions of the Statute concerning the general voting rules of the Governing Council of the ECB.
This is due to the Treaty provisions that apply to the homeaffairs area, in particular different voting rules in the Council stemming from variable geometry pursuant to Protocols 19(on the Schengen acquis), 21(the position of the United Kingdom and Ireland in respect of the area of Freedom, Security and Justice) and 22 on the position of Denmark, including in relation to Title V, part three of the Treaty.
Due to different voting rules in the Council stemming from variable geometry pursuant to Protocols 19(on the Schengen acquis), 21(the position of the UK and Ireland in respect of the area of Freedom, Security and Justice) and 22(the position of Denmark, including in relation to Title V, part three of the Treaty) it is not legally possible to draw up one single comprehensive legislative proposal for an Internal Security Fund, despite the coherence of the policy objectives to be addressed.