Examples of using Framework decisions in English and their translations into Hungarian
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
-
Medicine
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Financial
-
Programming
-
Official/political
-
Computer
The system is based on 3'framework decisions'.
Framework decisions are not directly applicable.
The system is based on 3'framework decisions'.
Framework decisions are not directly applicable.
The EU has adopted five legislative instruments(Framework Decisions) designed to deprive traffickers of their gains20.
Framework Decisions do not entail direct effect.
This exercise concerns first of all the legislative instruments that require transposition by the Member States-Directives and Framework Decisions.
However, framework decisions do not have direct effect9.
It is in this spirit that the EU adopted in 2008 and2009 three complementary Framework Decisions whose respective transposition deadlines have expired.
Adopt framework decisions for the purpose of approximation of the laws and regulations of the Member States.
This exercise concerns first of all the legislative instruments that require transposal bythe Member States- Directives and Framework Decisions.
Certain Framework Decisions which provide for differing deadlines for implementation are covered by successive reports(e.g. the crime victims Framework Decision). .
The Commission maynot initiate infringement proceedings based on these framework decisions for a period of five years starting from the entry into force of the Lisbon Treaty14.
Framework Decisions do not have direct effect however, and the Commission cannot take legal action before the Court of Justice to enforce the transposition of a Framework Decision. .
Legally binding acts adopted by legislative procedure(such as regulations,directives and framework decisions) are referred to as legislative acts or"legislation".
Even though progress has been achievedby Member States for some of the legal instruments during the last year, lengthy delays in communicating transposition measures have been noted for Framework Decisions.
At the time of writing, respectively 10, 14 and16 Member States have not yet transposed the Framework Decisions more than 2 years and 1 year after the implementation date.
(SL) The two reports on the framework decisions form two further pieces in the jigsaw of a broad range of regulations, directives and other documents relating to the fight against terrorism.
EU cooperation mechanisms(see for instance the 2005 decision on the communication of terrorist-related information to Europol and Eurojust)will be triggered, since the Framework Decisions falls within their scope.
Encourage Member States to implement complementary measures(four Framework Decisions) addressing issues such as the transfer of sentences and judgments when the defendant is not present;
Framework Decisions as legal instruments can best be compared to a directive, as they are binding upon Member States as to the result to be achieved but leave to the national authorities the choice of form and methods.
The report examines the implementation of three separate EU Framework Decisions covering(1) the transfer of prisoners,(2) probation and alternative sanctions,(3) and the European Supervision Order.
By their nature, Framework Decisions are binding upon the Member States as to the result to be achieved, but it is a matter for the national authorities to choose the form and method of implementation.
A number of mutual recognition instruments are potentially affected by the issue of detention conditions:The instruments in question are the Council Framework Decisions on the European Arrest Warrant, the transfer of prisoners, mutual recognition of alternative sanctions and probation and the European Supervision Order.
As the Framework Decisions are based on mutual trust in other Member States' legal systems, the decision of the judge in the issuing State should be respected and, in principle, there should be no revision or adaptation of this decision. .
Criminal justice: Commission requests IRELAND to implement fully three Framework Decisions on probation measures and alternative sanctions, on supervision measures and on financial penalties.
The non-implementation of the Framework Decisions by some Member States is very problematic since thoseMember States who have properly implemented the Framework Decisions cannot benefit from their co-operation provisions in their relations with those Member States who did not implement them in time.
The efforts of the Member States that implemented the Framework Decisions in time should be underlined and the comments relating to those Member States should be understood in the light of the approach of the Commission to provide assistance in the implementation process.
The EU has adopted numerous directives, communications and framework decisions which address matters related to the fight against corruption and fraud, tax fraud and tax evasion, money laundering, corporate social responsibility, reporting on non-financial transactions, corporate governance, public procurement and auditing.
The EU has adopted directives, communications and framework decisions which mainly establish minimum standards and address matters which also relate to the fight against corruption and fraud: tax fraud and tax evasion, money laundering, corporate social responsibility, reporting on non-financial transactions, corporate governance, public procurement and auditing.